Githawk: Add CI

Created on 25 Jul 2017  路  16Comments  路  Source: GitHawkApp/GitHawk

I think adding CI would be nice. Could prevent things like #182


Candidates:

updated

Most helpful comment

@rnystrom Maybe be worth chucking to towards top of your to-do list? 馃槃

Would be nice to get a starting point to get a couple tests, and at least make sure things are building!

Maybe even hook up continuous deployment so we get faster builds out to test flight to constantly be looking at latest changes

All 16 comments

I'm down for whatever is:

  • Free
  • high signal (fast, not flaky)

I think travisci because of popularity is quite slow.. why don't you give buddybuild a try, pick starter plans / free

screen shot 2017-08-04 at 12 47 23 pm

Circle is another option, they are free for open source projects too

@BasThomas circle ci is great, but not free for osx :(

actually i may be wrong about this but it's not an automated process

https://circleci.com/pricing/#faq-section-os-x

We also offer the Seed plan for OS X open-source projects. Contact us at [email protected] for access.

Yes - you'll have to send them an email. I think they respond to them pretty quickly though.

@rnystrom ryan i think you have to enable this as the project owner

let me know if you need help, going on the sites and connecting the repo is pretty simple

@BasThomas @dkhamsing which do you feel is the most reliable?

Both Circle and Travis have been 馃憤

@rnystrom I've used Circle, Travis, and BuddyBuild.

Travis would be great, if it weren't painfully slow -- even on paid tiers.

BuddyBuild is a super-feature-loaded service. Has a lot of cool stuff built in that you _probably won't_ need but are _nice to have_. Fast, reliable.

Circle is a no-frills service. Fast, reliable, and lets you SSH into specific builds pretty easily.

I'm pretty partial to Circle.

I'd vote for BuddyBuild.

All over the place! Leaning towards Circle (Travis has also been a pain with IGLK)

@rnystrom Maybe be worth chucking to towards top of your to-do list? 馃槃

Would be nice to get a starting point to get a couple tests, and at least make sure things are building!

Maybe even hook up continuous deployment so we get faster builds out to test flight to constantly be looking at latest changes

@rnystrom We good to close this since it should all be working now? 馃槃

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

BasThomas picture BasThomas  路  3Comments

BasThomas picture BasThomas  路  3Comments

Iron-Ham picture Iron-Ham  路  3Comments

BasThomas picture BasThomas  路  3Comments

rizwankce picture rizwankce  路  3Comments