$ git --version --build-options
** insert your machine's response here **
$ cmd.exe /c ver
** insert your machine's response here **
# One of the following:
> type "C:\Program Files\Git\etc\install-options.txt"
> type "C:\Program Files (x86)\Git\etc\install-options.txt"
> type "%USERPROFILE%\AppData\Local\Programs\Git\etc\install-options.txt"
$ cat /etc/install-options.txt
** insert your machine's response here **
* insert your response here *
* insert your response here *
** insert your commands here **
* insert here *
* insert here *
* insert URL here *
weird -- error popped up per title then resolved itself 10 minutes later
@pdhoward This might be related to GitHub disabling weak cryptography. They did a test for 1 hour today, and they plan to disable them permanently on the 22nd.
@pdhoward can you share which version of Git for Windows and Windows you are running? The fact that the error was intermittent probably means you should update before you get caught again when it's disabled permanently...
* insert your machine's response here *
@shiftkey is there a way to auto-label new tickets where the reporter did not bother to fill out the information we suggest to provide so that it is possible to help them?
Sorry - I abandoned the thread above thinking the problem was resolved. My version of git is 1.9.5.msysgit.1 .. I am running win 10.0.16299.1921 .. any help here would be greatly appreciated!
My version of git is 1.9.5.msysgit.1 .. I am running win 10.0.16299.1921 .. any help here would be greatly appreciated!
@pdhoward Ah the good (bad) old 1.9.5.msysgit.1 While there are still some users of the older versions, essentially the old 1.9.5.msysgit was the last of that ilk. The team moved over to the newer interface versions at the start of the Git 2.x series.
If I may suggest that moving up to a much newer version of the latest and greatest (especially with security fixes!) would be the way to go. Try the last of the 2.15.x series if you are worried about the foibles of 2.16.0.x.
Also there is a change coming to Github that will stop tls v1 operating, so do make the change before the cut off date.
Thanks much! You can see I have not been paying attention to this. I'll fix it now!
is there a way to auto-label new tickets where the reporter did not bother to fill out the information we suggest to provide so that it is possible to help them?
@dscho there's nothing in-the-box currently but I think the Probot community would be interesting to look at - this integration is an interesting example related to your issue, and I'm sure there's others that could be built upon if you wanted to tailor the interactions when new issues arrive here.
@shiftkey what's the easiest way to set up a Probot integration? It there a convenient Azure template?
@dscho there's some docs around deployment here but nothing for Azure. There's some interest in getting this running on serverless infrastructure like AWS Lambda, but that's a way off I think.
I'd be majorly interested in getting this to run as Azure Function. If only I had abundant time on my hands and would not have to take care of 93 open tickets (and a lot of behind-the-scene work)...
There's some interest in getting this running on serverless infrastructure like AWS Lambda, but that's a way off I think.
Hopefully not too far off. A few people have it running on Lambda and GCF already. The tricky part is that each cloud provider has it's own HTTP Gateway and function signature. @jasonetco was able to get his running on GCF by writing this handler, so it should work similarly on Azure by calling the probot.receive() method inside the Azure function handler. I'd be happy to work with someone to get it working.