Getx: [Question] Is it possible?

[zl910627]

According to the image above, reactive state management can be used without defining the controller separately.
I would appreciate it if you could let me know if this is possible.

[jonataslaw]

It's possible.
It is not a good practice, but it is perfectly possible

[zl910627]

Another question, what is different between GetView / GetWidget , and recommended use case ?

[jonataslaw]

Use GetView.
GetWidget is for a specific context where you have lists, and you want to have a controller for each item. In this case, instead of using GetView with Get.put/lazyPut, you use GetWidget with Get.create().

GetView is simpler, it's just a StatelessWidget, GetWidget caches the controller, so it can be used with Get.create, you may not need it.

Please try not to use the issues field to ask questions, join one of the community channels, where you will have a quicker response, in addition to being the appropriate channel for that. This space is reserved for issues and requests for resources, so I'm closing this.

[Nipodemos]

@jonataslaw i remember that some time ago, GetWidget was exactly the same as GetView.

When the breaking change happened? I looked a bit on changelog but i didn't found anything commenting on that

[jonataslaw]

Actually, there was no breaking change, but a cache was added to GetWidget to make use of Get.create().
I think this should be documented, but I still think about tinkering with this API, because onInit and onClose are not called when Get.create is used.
I think the change was so small that I ended up forgetting to document and insert it on ChangeLog, sorry.