Getx: Name could be improved to find it in web

[antonyr]

Thank you for the great framework.

When I want to quickly search for solutions in Google, since the name is Get (as it is a very generic term), It is hard to find on web.

Please consider changing the name of the framework while retaining APIs as is.

[jonataslaw]

I know that Get really is the worst keyword I could find, but unfortunately I don't know what to do, maybe adding another keyword will help you, but it might be difficult to change the name now, there are practically 400 stars on the pub.dev .
That's really a question that I would love suggestions

[NiranjanShah]

I had suggested the same earlier, will be gr8 it you can come up with some good name.....

[jonataslaw]

Maybe I'll change the internal names and start using GetX.
This would cause minimal impact as it would only add one letter.
It would be easy to remember and I would have minimal changes.
If I change my name I will have to deprecate the current package. And by adding X, I can easily enjoy the current one.

[ghprod]

GetX :+1:

[NiranjanShah]

GetX 👍 and thanks for accepting our request !!!!!

Regards
Niranjan G Shah

On 12-Jun-2020, at 1:43 PM, Ferri Sutanto [e-mail] wrote:

GetX 👍

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jonataslaw/get/issues/228#issuecomment-643138464, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACHCLQRSSP2S7IAEVMEQAITRWHPQ5ANCNFSM4N4A6NGQ.

[maPer77]

I thought the same thing, GET is very generic ...
GetX is good..
.... I would like to make a suggestion ...: "iGet"

[jonataslaw]

I am moving this discussion to that topic.

https://github.com/jonataslaw/get/issues/238