Foundation-sites: [Revisit] List Group components

[IamManchanda]

I think we should to revisit PR #9947 for the list group component to push it into core instead.

Reasons:

1. Super uselful for sidebars, off-canvas, or mobile menus.
2. Generic Component instead of handful tasks!
3. Bootstrap have it.
4. Bulma is thinking about to have it.
5. Material Design Components have it!

[brettsmason]

Isn't this just a vertical menu with borders? Could we simply not have a modifier class for menu to apply the correct borders, eg 'menu-bordered' or something? Not sure this needs be another new component, but just my opinion :smile:

[IamManchanda]

Dang no issue @brettsmason ...

Yup .menu-bordered combined with Active ... is an another option too ....
But there is one issue in that scenario,
List groups are mostly for menu but not just for menu!

[IamManchanda]

List group can be useful for stuff's like where things like cards or panel is so popular
Example: Notification Panel, Shopping List etc

[JeremyEnglert]

I think this may be best as part of the new prototyping classes. In fact, it's perfect for that.

A big part of the reason Foundation is popular is because it ISN'T Bootstrap or Material. Foundation gives you a much cleaner canvas to start from. If we start providing too many of these design related elements, a big reason for using Foundation is lost.

[IamManchanda]

@JeremyEnglert

I think this may be best as part of the new prototyping classes. In fact, it's perfect for that.

Hmmmnnn... sounds good but i am not sure about that
@kball @rafibomb can i get a word from one of you before doing an action ??

[kball]

This almost sounds more like a building block, no?

[IamManchanda]

I feel this like a component rather than a prototype utility first and foremost
But I don't concur that it doesn't deserve to be in the core component sections!

Secondly I strongly think for f7 to {theme up}
We would want components of material design to be a part of the components in the core section (of course as a flat design) like this one and #9645 ??

[andycochran]

Let's revisit this for v7.