Foundation-sites: [Feature] Foundation 7: #8024 Margin grids

Created on 24 Jan 2017  路  9Comments  路  Source: foundation/foundation-sites

As foundation 7 gonna be most probably flexbox only ( #9591 )
and if its gonna be flexbox only, then its a android 2-4.3 drop also

That means we can surely use calc() now
http://caniuse.com/#feat=calc

So,
I propose => #8024

Codepen => http://codepen.io/corysimmons/pen/dGmEBW

.small-1 {
  width: calc(100% * 1/12 - 30px);
}

Most helpful comment

@corysimmons Ohk if you think i am a robot, then i am a robot !!!

Also, tagging a author of an another competitor framework (who co-incidentally is a director of design at github also) and asking him to ban you from github .... isn't healthy sir!!!

All 9 comments

=> https://webdesign.tutsplus.com/tutorials/calc-grids-are-the-best-grids--cms-22902
=> https://www.sitepoint.com/creative-grid-system-sass-calc/

Tagging @corysimmons

I don't like flexbox (flexbugs) and I live in a shack in the woods 1-hr away from rural internet, with a broken computer. I'm poor/borderline homeless.

I appreciate you tagging me for my input, but I'm burnt out/depressed as hell.

Use https://github.com/corysimmons/postcss-ant if you like grids and layout.

Ping me if anyone wants to sponsor a unique CSS framework that will bury all these clones.

Dang @corysimmons are you ok man? Do you want someone to talk to / can we help you out?

:disappointed: OMG.... I am very sorry to hear that ..... I didn't meant to hurt you cory sir .... Sorry if I did...


But @kball my question/feature request for foundation 7 remains intact
For me ,
Calc based grids will be better if browser support allows that ?
With a simple reason,

  • Padding grid is kinda sort of a hack
  • whereas, Calc based or margin grids is more so a feature !
  • It will remove the extra markup and make the css file less bulky without those gutter paddings!

What do you think Kevin sir ?

I don't like flexbox (flexbugs)

@corysimmons But I like flexbox or flexbugs, untill CSS grids gets the browser support

Just saw my email notifications ( deleted comment ) and,
What is this @corysimmons ? => http://simple.harry.zone/so-shocking-comment.png

I Tagged you because you posted a rather nice affirmation exactly a year back and was rejected that time due to browser support and thought that if i will tag you, you might help me in the codes etc if it gets accepted this time .... but what you commented ( deleted comment ) is so unproffesional.

Can't tell you how shocking this is and what is more shocking that it is coming from the maker of Jeet, Lost, Typographic, Boy, and postcss-ant?????


And as you were expecting ( inb4 ) excuses, so here's mine,

ZURB is just constantly trying to emulate whatever Bootstrap does and whatever the masses are group thinking at the time. Somehow, someway, newbs think that means Foundation > Bootstrap, but neither framework makes any attempt at doing anything unique/useful.

You haven't been around the development so that's why you are saying like this. Whatever i have seen both frameworks give their best to the PR's / Issues in whatever bandwith they have. Simply things sometimes gets cut out due to the core motive of a framework or the browser support and that's fine.
Every one cant be happy with everything !!!

@kball Thanks for your concern. Give me a job and move me to civilization and treat me like a human?

@mdo ban me from GitHub please. I keep coming back to this place in hopes of seeing something interesting/important. It's always just the same robots saying the same things.

I don't particularly feel like MIT'ing away my life anymore.

@corysimmons Ohk if you think i am a robot, then i am a robot !!!

Also, tagging a author of an another competitor framework (who co-incidentally is a director of design at github also) and asking him to ban you from github .... isn't healthy sir!!!

1 sec. Giving you emojis.

@corysimmons Sorry you got tagged into discussion on a framework you're not interested in. Closing this issue so as not to bother you with additional notifications, moving the discussion to #9699

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings