Description
There are two images which I consider incorrect:
In these images the light box should actually be behind the box with the double margin to be consistent with their counter parts "bring-forward". Currently, these images are just rotations of their counter parts. The four images "send-back", "send-backward", "bring-forward", and "bring-front" should all have the a consistent shade for the primary/secondary box, which is not the case for the regular and the light style.
The images for the icons "far fa-send-backward" (solid style) and "fad fa-send-backward" (duotone style) on the other hand are correct. Here, the shade of the primary box is consistently dark.
To Reproduce
Apparently I cannot test pro icons on jsfiddle. Just use this code:
<i class="far fa-send-back"></i>
<!-- Incorrect image -->
<i class="far fa-send-backward"></i>
<i class="far fa-bring-forward"></i>
<i class="far fa-bring-front"></i>
<i class="fal fa-send-back"></i>
<!-- Incorrect image -->
<i class="fal fa-send-backward"></i>
<i class="fal fa-bring-forward"></i>
<i class="fal fa-bring-front"></i>
You will see that the marked images are incorrect.
Expected behavior
The light box should be behind the shaded box, not in front of it.
Screenshots
Currently incorrect image:

Expected image (mock-up):

Same goes for the "light" style.
Version and implementation
Version: 5.10.2
Browser and version: Google Chrome Version 76.0.3809.132 (Official Build) (64-Bit)
Bug report checklist
Hi!
Thanks for being part of the Font Awesome Community and thanks for reporting this.
Well, I definitely think there is something weird with those icons (I don't know which is the wrong one, it could be fas/fad bring-forward.
Anyway, let's assign @sensibleworld so he can take a look
Hey, thanks for the quick response!
If we take into account all 16 icons, it becomes clear that the two icons for „send-back“ are the issue. The „bring-forward“ icons are consistent with the „bring-front“ and „send-back“ icons.
Thanks for looking into it!
@otrinnes Thanks for the heads-up! After checking these out, it definitely looks like I made a mistake when getting these made. I'll get it fixed up promptly.
This should be fixed in the latest 5.11 release.
This should be fixed in the latest 5.11 release.
Looking good, thanks!