Function declaration should render as func ≠<T : RawRepre..., but renders as func !≤T : RawRepre...

I think this is another reason to get rid of =< as per #355
(and did you mean it should render as func ≠<T? That’s what it would render as without the =< ligature or if != had priority, but that’s not what you listed.
@dhouck You got it!
And I have no opinion on =< becoming ≤ or not; I imagine someone somewhere uses that but I've never seen it used.
Also, I think I worded it right... I was trying to match my screenshot, so I included the RawReprese :P
The symbol you used is U+2244, NOT ASYMPTOTICALLY EQUAL TO. I would expect != to ligature to U+2260 NOT EQUAL TO, which is what it should be doing.
(The difference is the top bar of the equal sign; is it straight or a tilde?)
Oops, that was just a typo. I originally meant to type func ≠<T, not func ≄<T. Sorry about the confusion :)
+1
Yes… the most common usage for ≤ is <= not =<.
Most helpful comment
I think this is another reason to get rid of
=<as per #355(and did you mean it should render as
func ≠<T? That’s what it would render as without the=<ligature or if!=had priority, but that’s not what you listed.