Every algebraic data type should contain motivation for WHY it's a useful abstraction.
It took me a while to understand why any of these are useful abstractions.
Raynos
All 3 comments
Not sure - does the promise specification have to say why promises are useful?
But I'm happy to include a separate Markdown file describing each of the classes :smile:
puffnfresh
on 12 Apr 2013
I have zero idea what Disjoint is ( https://github.com/tonymorris/type-class/blob/master/src/Data/Semigroupoid/Disjoint.hs ). If your going to port all of them please give some explanations for people that don't understand haskell.
Raynos
on 12 Apr 2013
The motivation appears to be, that Haskell has refactored some people's brains to the point that they want to continue thinking in Haskell instead of thinking in JS :trollface:
Coming from Java I was brainwashed by a lot of OOP concepts, and it took me awhile to learn to adapt and think in a non-OOP way again.
jedwards1211
on 24 Jan 2018
Related issues
framp
路
16Comments
davidchambers
路
15Comments
wenkanglin
路
4Comments
puffnfresh
路
5Comments
evilsoft
路
8Comments
Most helpful comment
The motivation appears to be, that Haskell has refactored some people's brains to the point that they want to continue thinking in Haskell instead of thinking in JS :trollface:
Coming from Java I was brainwashed by a lot of OOP concepts, and it took me awhile to learn to adapt and think in a non-OOP way again.