The list of changes for 3.2 seamlessly include the changes from 3.0.1 to 3.1.
For example, "epubReadingSystem Object Clarifications":
3.2:
https://w3c.github.io/publ-epub-revision/epub32/spec/epub-changes.html#sec-cdoc-rso
3.1:
http://www.idpf.org/epub/31/spec/epub-changes.html#sec-cdoc-rso
For those (like me) who would like to know what actually changed between 3.1 and 3.2, would it be possible to explicitly annotate 3.2 changelog entries that are "inherited" from the 3.1 changelog? (if possible, with links / cross-references too?)
Thanks! :)
Hmmm... a reason not to do this would be that if 3.1 is "withdrawn" it really ceases to exist. That's why I kinda like 3.2 being the update from 3.0.1.
But reasonable people can have different views here!
The issues we're addressing in this revision are also all marked with the 3.2 milestone in github, so if you just want to see what's been done post-3.1 you can have a look at: https://github.com/w3c/publ-epub-revision/issues?q=is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22EPUB+3.2%22+is%3Aclosed
Thanks @mattgarrish that's a useful "diff" tool indeed.
@GarthConboy I can go along with that rationale :)
Feel free to mark as resolved and close. Works for me.
Closed by CG resolution and consent of original reporter.
Most helpful comment
Hmmm... a reason not to do this would be that if 3.1 is "withdrawn" it really ceases to exist. That's why I kinda like 3.2 being the update from 3.0.1.
But reasonable people can have different views here!