Deprecation plan:
--redirect-container-streaming
flag as deprecated. Log a warning on use.StreamingProxyRedirects
feature as deprecated. Log a warning on use.--redirect-container-streaming
can no longer be enabled. If the flag is set, log an errorStreamingProxyRedirects
to disabled. If there is a >= 2 version skew between master--redirect-container-streaming
, this will breakStreamingProxyRedirects
can still be manually enabled.--redirect-container-streaming
flag.StreamingProxyRedirects
feature./sig node
Hi @tallclair, -- 1.19 Enhancements Lead here. I see from the KEP that no work is planned for 1.19. I just wanted to confirm if that is still the case?
Thank you!
Yep, confirmed. I'll paste the rollout plan here to make raise the visibility. We do have an action coming up in
/milestone v1.20
--redirect-container-streaming
flag as deprecated. Log a warning on use.StreamingProxyRedirects
feature as deprecated. Log a warning on use.--redirect-container-streaming
can no longer be enabled. If the flag is set, log an errorStreamingProxyRedirects
to disabled. If there is a >= 2 version skew between master--redirect-container-streaming
, this will breakStreamingProxyRedirects
can still be manually enabled.--redirect-container-streaming
flag.StreamingProxyRedirects
feature.@tallclair Thank you for the update. Also, a big shoutout for putting put all future plans in the issue as a comment. :heavy_plus_sign:
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Hi @tallclair
Enhancements Lead here, can you confirm whether this will have work in 1.20? (alpha/beta/GA?)
Thanks!
Kirsten
Yes, this has some work targeting v1.20. I hoisted the rollout plan to the issue description.
So I noticed that this is a Deprecation rollout, so I'm wondering how to track this against alpha/beta/stable.. Maybe this could be beta? But I feel like I'm forcing it :thinking:
WDYT @tallclair @palnabarun ?
Yeah, I don't think alpha/beta/ga makes sense here. I don't know enough about the feature tracking process to know what the alternatives are.
@tallclair let me check on this and i'll report back!
After discussing, we agree it's important to track & publicize, so we made a new status so that we can track this as a _drumroll_ deprecation! :smile:
Hey @tallclair !
Since your Enhancement is scheduled to be in 1.20, please keep in mind the important upcoming dates:
Friday, Nov 6th: Week 8 - Docs Placeholder PR deadline <--- Pretty sure you'll want to do this one for the deprecation
Thursday, Nov 12th: Week 9 - Code Freeze
As a reminder, please link all of your k/k PR as well as docs PRs to this issue so we can track them.
Thanks!
Kirsten :smiley:
Hello @tallclair , 1.20 Docs shadow here.
Does this enhancement work planned for 1.20 require any new docs or modification to existing docs?
If so, please follows the steps here to open a PR against the dev-1.20
branch in the k/website
repo. This PR can be just a placeholder at this time and must be created before Nov 6th.
Also take a look at Documenting for a release to get yourself familiarize with the docs requirement for the release.
Thank you!
No docs changes needed for this one.
Hi @tallclair
Please keep in mind the important upcoming dates:
As a reminder, please link all of your k/k PR as well as docs PR to this issue for the release team to track.
Hi @tallclair
Looks like kubernetes/kubernetes#95935 is merged and that was the only PR for 1.20 - correct?
As a note: Code Freeze is coming up in 2 days on Thursday, November 12th. All PRs must be merged by that date, otherwise an Exception is required.
Thanks!
Kirsten
Correct.