_Please to keep this description up to date. This will help the Enhancement Team track efficiently the evolution of the enhancement_
k/kubeadm tracking issue:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/1379
2019-07-29:
2019-08-22:
@kacole2 hi, i've just added this issue / feature to tracked/yes
. please update if needed.
the KEP just merged https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/pull/1159
@neolit123 I got you. thanks!
@neolit123 thanks for taking care of creating this issue!
Hey @neolit123 @fabriziopandini
I'm one of the v1.16 docs shadows.
Does this enhancement (or the work planned for v1.16) require any new docs (or modifications to existing docs)? If not, can you please update the 1.16 Enhancement Tracker Sheet (or let me know and I鈥檒l do so)
If so, just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.16) due by Friday, August 23rd, it can just be a placeholder PR at this time. Let me know if you have any questions!
hi @sethmccombs
I'm one of the v1.16 docs shadows.
Does this enhancement (or the work planned for v1.16) require any new docs (or modifications to existing docs)? If not, can you please update the 1.16 Enhancement Tracker Sheet (or let me know and I鈥檒l do so)
yes, it does require docs.
If so, just a friendly reminder we're looking for a PR against k/website (branch dev-1.16) due by Friday, August 23rd, it can just be a placeholder PR at this time. Let me know if you have any questions!
i've added a placeholder docs PRs: TODO
note in the OP.
we will definitely create place holder PRs before the 23rd.
thanks for the heads up!
@sethmccombs
hi, we spoke about whether this requires docs again during the office hours of kubeadm (Wed 21Aug) and decided to not add any documentation for this feature's Alpha stage.
i will defer to @fabriziopandini if we decide to change our mind later down the line.
i've also updated the OP with some WIP/merged PRs.
thanks
@neolit123 I am the 1.16 Docs Lead. I will go ahead and put this down as docs-not-required. @fabriziopandini Please let me change of this changes before the end of Aug 23.
@neolit123 code freeze for 1.16 is on Thursday 8/29. Looks like all PRs here have been merged. If that's the case, congrats on getting this in for Alpha!
Hey there @neolit @fabianofranz -- 1.17 Enhancements lead here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be graduating to alpha/beta/stable in 1.17?
The current release schedule is:
If you do, please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 馃憤
Thanks!
/milestone clear
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale
/lifecycle frozen
Enhancement issues opened in kubernetes/enhancements
should never be marked as frozen.
Enhancement Owners can ensure that enhancements stay fresh by consistently updating their states across release cycles.
/remove-lifecycle frozen
@neolit123 what about moving to beta in 1.18?
@fabriziopandini from the KEP:
This proposal in its initial version covers only the creation of a new alpha feature. Graduation criteria will be defined in the following iterations on this proposal and consider user feedback as well.
do you think it would be best to present the changes you wish to make in the kubeadm office hours and update the KEP if people agree?
Hey there @neolit123 @fabriziopandini -- 1.18 Enhancements shadow here. I see that there has been traction on this enhancement. Let us know about the consensus from the kubeadm office hours whether this will go to beta.
The current release schedule is:
If you would like to include this enhancement, once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 馃憤
We'll be tracking enhancements here: http://bit.ly/k8s-1-18-enhancements
Thanks! :)
@neolit123 I'm +1 for moving to beta in 1.18. Opinions?
@fabriziopandini
as commented here:
https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/1177#issuecomment-572592278
i think, it would be best to talk about this in the office hours this week and decide if we want to target the enhancement freeze of 28th.
@palnabarun
As discussed in the kubeadm office hours today, we decided to keep this feature in alpha for some more time. no changes planned for the v1.18 cycle
Thank you @fabriziopandini for the updates. I will remove this enhancement from the tracking sheet,
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
Hey there @fabriziopandini -- 1.19 Enhancements shadow here. I wanted to check in and see if you think this Enhancement will be graduating in 1.19?
In order to have this part of the release:
The current release schedule is:
If you do, I'll add it to the 1.19 tracking sheet (http://bit.ly/k8s-1-19-enhancements). Once coding begins please list all relevant k/k PRs in this issue so they can be tracked properly. 馃憤
Thanks!
@msedzins hi, we are not going to make changes related to this in 1.19.
Thank you @neolit123 for letting me know.
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close
.
Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
/remove-lifecycle stale
(trying again)
Hi @neolit123
Enhancements Lead here. Any plans for this in 1.20?
Thanks!
Kirsten
Hi. We have plans to close this issue as the feature is going to be removed
in 1.20. Was deprecated since 1.19 and replaced by --experimenal-patches.
Hi @neolit123
Any update on closing this issue?
+1 to close this, the code was removed by https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/94871
/close
@neolit123: Closing this issue.
In response to this:
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
Most helpful comment
hi @sethmccombs
yes, it does require docs.
i've added a
placeholder docs PRs: TODO
note in the OP.we will definitely create place holder PRs before the 23rd.
thanks for the heads up!