Why we need executable name electron-builder? Because create-react-app also has build task and it leads to confusion. Now you can use electron-builder instead of build. Name is too long? Yes — maybe soon elb will be added as alias, feel free suggest your variants.
Of course, build will be not removed due backward compatibility :)
Do you like elb? Please vote using reactions 👍 or 👎 and if you don't like, please explain / suggest your variant.
elb is a common acronym used with AWS, which could confuse the situation? ebuild?
I think electron-builder is fine
ebuild?
Thanks, @brandonhilkert https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Ebuild
@develar ah...probably always something then. Maybe it's not worth shortening. The trade-off doesn't seem worth the potential confusion. I vote keep it electron-builder.
I think electron-builder is fine as well. Other plugins like electron-windows-store, etc. use the full name and it's clear what's going on.
Especially if someone is using a lot of plugins and commands in their process, using the full name adds a lot of clarity.
electron-builder is alright. There is no need to have it any other way.
+1 for electron-builder
+2½ for full name
Thanks to all. Short named bin will be not added.
Most helpful comment
I think
electron-builderis fine