if you use -schema, you will get all the tables AND VIEWS in that schema, even though you have provided a table list.
if you provide a table list but no schema, you will get both tables and views from all schemas in the db.
or have I missed something?
⚠Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.
@baltmann Thanks for reporting; this does sound like a bug.
@ErikEJ?
OK, I see two issues reported here:
if you use -schema, you will get all the tables AND VIEWS in that schema, even though you have provided a table list.
I do not use that feature in EF Core Power Tools (I provide an explicit list of table and view names, so there might be an issue here - but an example/repro would be very useful (SQL table/view create scripts and used command line)
if you provide a table list but no schema, you will get both tables and views from all schemas in the db. or have I missed something?
An example would be nice (SQL table/view create scripts and used command line) , I have not encountered this with EF Core Power Tools.
Will transfer to produce repo once transfer is available again.
@ajcvickers
if you use -Schemas, you will get all the tables AND VIEWS in that schema, even though you have provided a table list.
Is this behavior going to change in 5.0, for example with SQL Server EFCORE provider?
Currently, I suppose it will scaffold all the tables in that schema even though a table list is specified using -Tables.
Consider a user has access to schemas X and Y and tables A and B exist in each of these schemas.
Now if the user wants to scaffold (reverse engineer) only table A in schema X, then the user would have to execute a command such as this:
Scaffold-DbContext -Schemas X -Tables A
But I suppose it will scaffold all the tables in schema X.
Is there a way to get the behavior that the user actually wanted?
You can use:
Scaffold-DbContext -Tables X.A
Most helpful comment
You can use: