We're using a variety of forms e.g. 'Explicit use of this property added in this revision of DCAT. ', 'Property added in this revision of DCAT. ' 'New property in this context in this revision of DCAT. ' and it might be better to harmonise the text.
I've started doing that.
I was also thinking that in these NOTEs it may be good to add a link to the relevant issue (as done already in some of the NOTEs).
WDYT?
Done in #919:
https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/andrea-perego-dcat-ed-rev/dcat/index.html
I used consistently the following sentences (let me know if I missed any):
New class / property added in this revision of DCAT.
- For classes / properties from other namespaces added in DCAT 2:
Class / Property added in this context in this revision of DCAT.
Pointers to the relevant issues are yet to be added.
Adding the links to the issues is good for people to be able to track the discussions - are you aware of others specs doing this though?
@davebrowning said:
I've done a parallel set of edits to the ttl file (just for editorial and change notes) in #926.
Thanks!
@andrea-perego question on 6.4.4 - should that use the 'added in this context' language? [For example, like 6.4.14
Thanks for spotting this. Fixed in #919 via https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/919/commits/a84b690c4d8fd730f832c905f52876e64031db11
The rest seemed fine
Thanks!
@agbeltran said:
Adding the links to the issues is good for people to be able to track the discussions - are you aware of others specs doing this though?
Not sure - I should check.
Looks like this should close with #984 (which is 'due for closing')
Most helpful comment
Looks like this should close with #984 (which is 'due for closing')