Dxwg: Harmonise notes about 'property/etc added in this revision of DCAT'

Created on 8 May 2019  路  7Comments  路  Source: w3c/dxwg

We're using a variety of forms e.g. 'Explicit use of this property added in this revision of DCAT. ', 'Property added in this revision of DCAT. ' 'New property in this context in this revision of DCAT. ' and it might be better to harmonise the text.

Editorial dcat

Most helpful comment

Looks like this should close with #984 (which is 'due for closing')

All 7 comments

I've started doing that.

I was also thinking that in these NOTEs it may be good to add a link to the relevant issue (as done already in some of the NOTEs).

WDYT?

Done in #919:

https://raw.githack.com/w3c/dxwg/andrea-perego-dcat-ed-rev/dcat/index.html

I used consistently the following sentences (let me know if I missed any):

  • For new classes / properties in the DCAT namespace:

New class / property added in this revision of DCAT.

  • For classes / properties from other namespaces added in DCAT 2:
    Class / Property added in this context in this revision of DCAT.

Pointers to the relevant issues are yet to be added.

Adding the links to the issues is good for people to be able to track the discussions - are you aware of others specs doing this though?

I've done a parallel set of edits to the ttl file (just for editorial and change notes) in #926.

@andrea-perego question on 6.4.4 - should that use the 'added in this context' language? [For example, like 6.4.14

The rest seemed fine

@davebrowning said:

I've done a parallel set of edits to the ttl file (just for editorial and change notes) in #926.

Thanks!

@andrea-perego question on 6.4.4 - should that use the 'added in this context' language? [For example, like 6.4.14

Thanks for spotting this. Fixed in #919 via https://github.com/w3c/dxwg/pull/919/commits/a84b690c4d8fd730f832c905f52876e64031db11

The rest seemed fine

Thanks!

@agbeltran said:

Adding the links to the issues is good for people to be able to track the discussions - are you aware of others specs doing this though?

Not sure - I should check.

Looks like this should close with #984 (which is 'due for closing')

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

andrea-perego picture andrea-perego  路  6Comments

nicholascar picture nicholascar  路  5Comments

jakubklimek picture jakubklimek  路  6Comments

davebrowning picture davebrowning  路  7Comments

andrea-perego picture andrea-perego  路  5Comments