Docusaurus: No branded docusaurus-init

Created on 23 Jan 2019  ยท  10Comments  ยท  Source: facebook/docusaurus

๐Ÿš€ Feature

A no-branded, totally vanilla docusaurus-init

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?

Yes

Motivation

via @jordwalke

Pitch

Have a version of docusaurus-init that does not include any logos, images, etc. Just vanilla.

Could be run like docusaurus-init --no-brand or something.

feature good first issue help wanted

Most helpful comment

@endiliey is anyone working on this? if not, I'd love to give it a shot ๐Ÿ‘

All 10 comments

I just ran into this too, was hard to make sure I found and removed all the branding. I think I still use a css class prefixed with fb in the footer I couldn't find to rename.

Can someone clarify what's the hackathon tag? should contributors avoid doing efforts on it?

@ahmadalfy Hi - please feel free to do work on those with the hackathon tag. Actually, let me remove it now. It was for a quick hackathon last week.

@kyldvs mentioned that it took a while to remove all branding, and this is a no-branding discussion, but what if there was a central place where you could change the branding everwhere if you did have a brand? and if that field is empty or null then it removes all branding from the template..?

@endiliey is anyone working on this? if not, I'd love to give it a shot ๐Ÿ‘

cc @yangshun

Sent from my iPhone

On 8 Oct 2019, at 12:37 PM, Alex Xie notifications@github.com wrote:

@endiliey is anyone working on this? if not, I'd love to give it a shot ๐Ÿ‘

โ€”
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

@yangshun I think that would be a good way to explore more the plugins config. What do you think?

Reviving an old thread. What constitutes vanilla? I was browsing around and starting with init gave me a few reference to docusarus but not a lot. Thank you for the context in advance. :]

@JoelMarcey

Not sure exactly either what should be done, but it looks related to https://github.com/facebook/docusaurus/issues/3489

Yeah, it seems like #3489 is about splitting up the base template into a series of templates for different use cases. So this vanilla template would be the base perhaps.

I think the maintenance factor is a valid concern too. Definitely still seems like an open and ongoing discussion. @fanny might have some creative ideas!

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

omry picture omry  ยท  3Comments

philipmjohnson picture philipmjohnson  ยท  3Comments

microbouji picture microbouji  ยท  3Comments

JoelMarcey picture JoelMarcey  ยท  3Comments

azu picture azu  ยท  3Comments