This page does not refer to the page on NULL handling
Add a link to null handling at the first mention of "NULL" at the top, and one more in "See also" at the bottom.
Hello @Amruta-Ranade
I understood this issue, and I am willing to contribute for the same.
Can you please assign it to me for the hacktoberfest event?
Thanks.
@aniketrb-github Hey! We are asking participants to work on one issue at a time. Once you finish working on the comparison page issue, check back to see if this one is available :)
hi @Amruta-Ranade can I work on this issue?
or do I have to wait till my previous PR gets merged? because it's still open as of now. Please let me know. Thanks.
@Amruta-Ranade I'd like to work on this if it's available.
@aniketrb-github I am merging your PR now but do you mind if @jeffugo took this one? I am trying to let more folks contribute and you already made an excellent contribution!
Update: Never mind. Assigned another issue to @jeffugo that they expressed interest in. Assigning this one to @aniketrb-github
Oh okay. Fine.
I'll work on it. Thanks @Amruta-Ranade.
@Amruta-Ranade , @knz
Q1) As per the issue description, I need to add a hyperlink(v19.2/null-handling.md) to the very first occurrence of NULL and not for the rest occurrences elsewhere, right?
Q2) And in See Also section on the same page, I guess I need to add a NEW entry of the Null Handling hyperlink here as well? right?
Also, the required 2 links that are to be added will be referencing the to the v19.2 strictly right?
Since the link in the "Issue Description" above points to the v20.2/null-handling.md
I see each version say v19.x or v.20.x have their own set of distinct/duplicate copies maintained as of now.
Please correct me if I'm wrong regarding my understanding here, So that I can proceed.
Thanks.
Yep..you are on the right track. Please update the 20.1 and 20.2 files as well.
Yep..you are on the right track. Please update the 20.1 and 20.2 files as well.
Thanks for the go-ahead.
I raised a PR, but I will do the changes for the v.20.2 and v.20.1 also shortly.
Do we need to handle it for v19.1 as well?
I have made changes currently for v19.2, v20.1, and v20.2
Umm..it's okay if you don't. I think we support two previous versions, so v19.1 docs need not be updated. If it turns out I am wrong, I will update them later :)
okay. it's just a small thing for me. If you want I can fix it and maybe save a few minutes of yours. No problem.
Go for it then :) And thank you!
Go for it then :) And thank you!
Sure. Not a problem. :)
Addressed in #8529