Docs: Dokyoomintashun? I'm not playin' no mo'. Get Down To O'Shack Hennessy's Office...

Created on 5 Jan 2019  Â·  2Comments  Â·  Source: dotnet/docs

The project was restored using Microsoft.NETCore.App version blah, but with current settings, version blah would be used instead

Really?? I am saddened that this is the best guidance you can provide. Why do you struggle so to provide useful troubleshooting information?

_The cream RISES to the top._

https://youtu.be/rWrlAmT4jyA

Oh yeah, Nothing Means NOTHING. Bad documentation means NOTHING. ...Zero.

There is nobody who does troubleshooting better than the following. Here is the kind of info we in the development community need when we get such bizarre compilation errors: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51642172/the-project-was-restored-using-microsoft-netcore-app-version-2-1-0-but-with-cur

We really don't need Self-contained deployment roll forward. Nope. What's the point of this information? Come on man.


Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

Area - .NET Core Guide Technology - CLI P1 Pri2 doc-enhancement dotnet-corprod

Most helpful comment

We aren't finding it in search - the error message tells us to go to http://aka.ms/dotnet-runtime-patch-selection for more information, which sends us here

All 2 comments

It seems this error comes from the roll forward behavior targeting one version and then the dependencies are now version-desynced.

Yes? I think we should improve this article to really call it out. People are finding it in search because of the error message listed in the article.

We aren't finding it in search - the error message tells us to go to http://aka.ms/dotnet-runtime-patch-selection for more information, which sends us here

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

svick picture svick  Â·  3Comments

ite-klass picture ite-klass  Â·  3Comments

ygoe picture ygoe  Â·  3Comments

ike86 picture ike86  Â·  3Comments

skylerberg picture skylerberg  Â·  3Comments