Docs.rs: meta: Cargo.toml package info seems out-of-date

[camelid]

I don't know if this is intentional, but the name of the docs.rs crate is still cratesfyi and the author is Onur Aslan:

https://github.com/rust-lang/docs.rs/blob/49099068e383bacb67f775537d3e61a3f58919e0/Cargo.toml#L1-L4

Shouldn't the name be docs-rs or something and the author be The Rust Project Developers like with the rustc crates?

[jyn514]

This would be a good first PR :)

[jyn514]

Oh - but please leave the name of the binary as cratesfyi, or we'll have to change all the scripts in prod.

[jyn514]

See also #244.

[camelid]

No rustbot, but still:

@rustbot claim

[rustbot]

Error: This repository is not enabled to use triagebot.
Add a triagebot.toml in the root of the master branch to enable it.

Please let @rust-lang/release know if you're having trouble with this bot.

[camelid]

Should I update the sub-crate Cargo.toml files? Including the cratesfyi one, it would be:

• https://github.com/rust-lang/docs.rs/blob/49099068e383bacb67f775537d3e61a3f58919e0/Cargo.toml
• https://github.com/rust-lang/docs.rs/blob/49099068e383bacb67f775537d3e61a3f58919e0/metadata/Cargo.toml
• https://github.com/rust-lang/docs.rs/blob/49099068e383bacb67f775537d3e61a3f58919e0/src/web/badge/Cargo.toml

[jyn514]

Hmm ... @rust-lang/docs-rs how do you feel about changing the authors field in all the packages to The Rust Project Developers or something similar? That's what rustc does: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/7dfbf59f100c52e991796739ff21b9720219703f/compiler/rustc/Cargo.toml#L2

[pietroalbini]

I'd add "The Rust Project Developers" in addition to Onur. They still created the project, and that should be credited.

[camelid]

So something like this then?

authors = ["Onur Aslan <...>", "The Rust Project Developers"]

(And the same sort of change for the inner crates.)

Rustfmt does it that way, but has The Rustfmt developers as the second author. Should we do The docs.rs Developers or go with The Rust Project Developers? Personally I think it might be better to go with The Rust Project Developers since we're all part of the Rust project and so it's the same authors.

[jyn514]

I like "The Rust Project Developers" but I don't feel strongly about it.

[Kixiron]

Wouldn't this be a good place to use the Docs.rs Team?

[pietroalbini]

I think "The Rust Project Developers" is the most appropriate here.

[camelid]

Opened #1039.