Is this a question?
@davisking, no. It is a suggestion to implement YOLO in DLIB to provide a CNN based object detector. It is the natural next step over HOG+SVM.
A state-of-art combination is YOLO + SqueezeNet.
Ah, yes. There are many possible extensions. I'm adding one to dlib and it should appear in the next release.
Could you provide more details? I've been working on this subject and want
to cooperate with DLIB project.
On Tuesday, 9 August 2016, Davis E. King [email protected] wrote:
Ah, yes. There are many possible extensions. I'm adding one to dlib and it
should appear in the next release.—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/davisking/dlib/issues/180#issuecomment-238605580, or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA9c19op8mB11HX8KHIGuPwRA_JEpsBks5qeKfcgaJpZM4Jeueg
.
Regards,
_Luiz Vitor Martinez Cardoso_
CEO & Founder at geeksys.com.br http://www.geeksys.com.br
Phone: (11) 97351-7097 | Skype: grabberbr
"If you wanna be successful, you need total dedication, go for your last
limit, give your best and love your love infinitely!"
"The only limits are the ones you place upon yourself"
The current object_detection tool in dlib is trained using this method: https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00046. There is an obvious extension of that to the CNN framework in dlib and I'm setting that up now. What is nice about it is that it avoids any kind of hard negative mining, uses all the training windows in each image, and optimizes the actual accuracy of the detector rather than a binary classification proxy. I've already got the code running and it works well and is convenient to use in very much the same ways as the existing object_detection tooling. I'm just cleaning up the API and working on software engineering flavored usability issues at the moment. When I'm finished I'll post it to github :)
@davisking how can I help your or review your code?
Not much to do right now. You can test it out when it's posted though.
That is always helpful :)
When are you planning to?
On Tuesday, 9 August 2016, Davis E. King [email protected] wrote:
Not much to do right now. You can test it out when it's posted though.
That is always helpful :)—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/davisking/dlib/issues/180#issuecomment-238688819, or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAA9c_PnE1p6NEVO0Cbuvj9QThsvZZ7Uks5qeOm8gaJpZM4Jeueg
I'm not sure. Hopefully in two weeks.
Have you tried it with SqueezeNet?
no
@davisking have you seen https://github.com/antikantian/facedet-squeezenet ?
No. Nice to see more people using dlib's new API though :)
@davisking any update on this feature?
It's all working. I'll probably post the code and an example this weekend.
Check this out :) https://github.com/davisking/dlib/blob/master/examples/dnn_mmod_ex.cpp
Most helpful comment
The current object_detection tool in dlib is trained using this method: https://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00046. There is an obvious extension of that to the CNN framework in dlib and I'm setting that up now. What is nice about it is that it avoids any kind of hard negative mining, uses all the training windows in each image, and optimizes the actual accuracy of the detector rather than a binary classification proxy. I've already got the code running and it works well and is convenient to use in very much the same ways as the existing object_detection tooling. I'm just cleaning up the API and working on software engineering flavored usability issues at the moment. When I'm finished I'll post it to github :)