Discord.js: Could MessageEmbed become extendable using Structures?

[Purpzie]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Kind of? I've often found myself starting to use util.splitMessage along with MessageEmbed.addField() just in case the content in case the field content is too long (for example, from a roles list command or an emoji list command).

Describe the ideal solution
Instead of using a separate function to do this though, it would be super useful to be able to just extend MessageEmbed. Plus it would help a lot of other people out if they have their own things they'd want to add to it.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Using a separate function - but it's much less clean than just extending MessageEmbed

Additional context
None needed 👍

[bdistin]

You don't need Structures to extend MessageEmbed. You can already do this on your own by simply extending MessageEmbed.

[Purpzie]

For sending an embed sure, but not for getting an embed from an existing message (unless I'm mistaken)

[izexi]

You can extend the Message structure and override Message#embeds to use your own extended MessageEmbed class.
https://github.com/discordjs/discord.js/blob/bb92289e45b4d9d576a4277d0bfa082814d2bc20/src/structures/Message.js#L93
Which can be done by replacing the Embed with your extended MessageEmbed class in the line above.

[Purpzie]

Thank you! 👍

[Purpzie]

Wait no, I just realized that would require me to extend the entire _patch method. It would be much more practical to be able to simply extend MessageEmbed using Structures.

[bdistin]

__entire__ _patch method...

Uh, I am not sure you understand how easy it is to extend methods based on your use of that qualifying word. It's really only this which is not arduous at all:

_patch(data) {
  super._patch(data);
  this.embeds = (data.embeds || []).map(e => new CustomEmbed(e)); 
}

[Purpzie]

Oh, my bad. Thanks for the explanation.
I'd also like to say, though, that it would be so much easier to simply make MessageEmbed available to Structures.extend(). There's no reason not to, really.