Developer-roadmap: Time needed for every part of roadmap

[papersaltserver]

What roadmap is this issue about?

• [ ] Frontend Roadmap
• [ ] Backend Roadmap
• [ ] DevOps Roadmap
• [x] All Roadmaps

What is this issue about?

• [ ] Discussion for a pull request I would want to open.
• [ ] Addition of a new item
• [ ] Removal of some existing item
• [ ] Changing in arrangement
• [ ] General suggestion
• [x] Sharing an Idea
• [ ] Something else

Please acknowledge the below listed

• [x] This is not a duplicate issue. I have searched and there is no existing issue for this.
• [x] I understand that these roadmaps are highly opinionated. The purpose is to not to include everything out there in these roadmaps but to have everything that is most relevant today comparing to the other options listed.
• [x] I have read the contribution docs before opening this issue.

Enter the details about the issue here

It would be great for people who learn some roadmap to understanding how much time do they need to get from point A to B. Some rough estimation if it is 1 hour, 20, 200, or 2000. It would for sure help people to move along this roadmap.

[CeoFred]

Time is relative, you can't force learning pace on an individual especially when it's not a competition. Keeping timing while learning should be an individual decision for a healthy learning. my 10 cents

[SuspiciousLookingOwl]

Time is relative, you can't force learning pace on an individual especially when it's not a competition. Keeping timing while learning should be an individual decision for a healthy learning. my 10 cents

While I agree time is relative, I still think it's a good idea to include this so each individual can get a rough estimation on how long will it take to learn each part based on how long they took to learn the previous part.

For example if the roadmap says it will take 15 hours to learn HTML and 100 hours to learn Javascript, and someone learned HTML in 30 hours, they would estimate that it will take around 200 hours for them to learn Javascript.

[CeoFred]

your estimate should definitely be powered by artificial intelligence,
because human beings are different.. don't be suprised to find out someone
learnt js faster than html or css

https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:56 PM Owl [e-mail] wrote:

Time is relative, you can't force learning pace on an individual
especially when it's not a competition. Keeping timing while learning
should be an individual decision for a healthy learning. my 10 cents

While I agree time is relative, I still think it's a good idea to include
this so each individual can get a rough estimation on how long will it take
to learn each part based on how long they took to learn the previous part.

For example if the roadmap says it will take 15 hours to learn HTML and
100 hours to learn Javascript, and someone learned HTML in 30 hours, they
would estimate that it will take around 200 hours for them to learn
Javascript.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/kamranahmedse/developer-roadmap/issues/816#issuecomment-736038147,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3QHHTLS746LMZKGUSSLHDSSQBJPANCNFSM4TXZQVBQ
.

[papersaltserver]

your estimate should definitely be powered by artificial intelligence, because human beings are different.. don't be suprised to find out someone learnt js faster than html or css https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon Virus-free. www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
…
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:56 PM Owl @.*> wrote: Time is relative, you can't force learning pace on an individual especially when it's not a competition. Keeping timing while learning should be an individual decision for a healthy learning. my 10 cents While I agree time is relative, I still think it's a good idea to include this so each individual can get a rough estimation on how long will it take to learn each part based on how long they took to learn the previous part. For example if the roadmap says it will take 15 hours to learn HTML and 100 hours to learn Javascript, and someone learned HTML in 30 hours, they would estimate that it will take around 200 hours for them to learn Javascript. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#816 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3QHHTLS746LMZKGUSSLHDSSQBJPANCNFSM4TXZQVBQ .

This is a very strange polemic. For a long time, all universities have learning programs. Every learning program there had a number of hours which is mandatory to complete a subject. This number of hours is an average estimated by a board of university or ministry. Of course, there are external degrees for people who could learn something at their own pace, but the number of such degrees is quite low. If universities can successfully graduate people based on averages is it inapplicable here?

[talktonok]

your estimate should definitely be powered by artificial intelligence, because human beings are different.. don't be suprised to find out someone learnt js faster than html or css https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon Virus-free. www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
…
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:56 PM Owl _@_.*> wrote: Time is relative, you can't force learning pace on an individual especially when it's not a competition. Keeping timing while learning should be an individual decision for a healthy learning. my 10 cents While I agree time is relative, I still think it's a good idea to include this so each individual can get a rough estimation on how long will it take to learn each part based on how long they took to learn the previous part. For example if the roadmap says it will take 15 hours to learn HTML and 100 hours to learn Javascript, and someone learned HTML in 30 hours, they would estimate that it will take around 200 hours for them to learn Javascript. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#816 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3QHHTLS746LMZKGUSSLHDSSQBJPANCNFSM4TXZQVBQ .

This is a very strange polemic. For a long time, all universities have learning programs. Every learning program there had a number of hours which is mandatory to complete a subject. This number of hours is an average estimated by a board of university or ministry. Of course, there are external degrees for people who could learn something at their own pace, but the number of such degrees is quite low. If universities can successfully graduate people based on averages is it inapplicable here?

You are absolutely right. I think it will be wise to give an estimated minimum time it will require an average person to learn each skill. But, still, it is not necessary

[CeoFred]

Well... i agree that we should relate this to a learning program, but since
this is self paced learning, it's not all-important

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:13 PM Dmitry Trukhanov [e-mail]
wrote:

your estimate should definitely be powered by artificial intelligence,
because human beings are different.. don't be suprised to find out someone
learnt js faster than html or css
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
Virus-free. www.avast.com
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
… <#m_-4239893257112212349_>
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:56 PM Owl @.*> wrote: Time is relative, you
can't force learning pace on an individual especially when it's not a
competition. Keeping timing while learning should be an individual decision
for a healthy learning. my 10 cents While I agree time is relative, I still
think it's a good idea to include this so each individual can get a rough
estimation on how long will it take to learn each part based on how long
they took to learn the previous part. For example if the roadmap says it
will take 15 hours to learn HTML and 100 hours to learn Javascript, and
someone learned HTML in 30 hours, they would estimate that it will take
around 200 hours for them to learn Javascript. — You are receiving this
because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#816
(comment)
https://github.com/kamranahmedse/developer-roadmap/issues/816#issuecomment-736038147>,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3QHHTLS746LMZKGUSSLHDSSQBJPANCNFSM4TXZQVBQ
.

This is a very strange polemic. For a long time, all universities have
learning programs. Every learning program there had a number of hours which
is mandatory to complete a subject. This number of hours is an average
estimated by a board of university or ministry. Of course, there are
external degrees for people who could learn something at their own pace,
but the number of such degrees is quite low. If universities can
successfully graduate people based on averages is it inapplicable here?

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/kamranahmedse/developer-roadmap/issues/816#issuecomment-736087862,
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3QHHT7NPXBYEMPFURCPW3SSQKKDANCNFSM4TXZQVBQ
.

[papersaltserver]

Well... i agree that we should relate this to a learning program, but since this is self paced learning, it's not all-important On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:13 PM Dmitry Trukhanov [e-mail] wrote:
…
your estimate should definitely be powered by artificial intelligence, because human beings are different.. don't be suprised to find out someone learnt js faster than html or css https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon Virus-free. www.avast.com https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> … <#m_-4239893257112212349_> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 9:56 PM Owl @.*> wrote: Time is relative, you can't force learning pace on an individual especially when it's not a competition. Keeping timing while learning should be an individual decision for a healthy learning. my 10 cents While I agree time is relative, I still think it's a good idea to include this so each individual can get a rough estimation on how long will it take to learn each part based on how long they took to learn the previous part. For example if the roadmap says it will take 15 hours to learn HTML and 100 hours to learn Javascript, and someone learned HTML in 30 hours, they would estimate that it will take around 200 hours for them to learn Javascript. — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#816 (comment) <#816 (comment)>>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3QHHTLS746LMZKGUSSLHDSSQBJPANCNFSM4TXZQVBQ . This is a very strange polemic. For a long time, all universities have learning programs. Every learning program there had a number of hours which is mandatory to complete a subject. This number of hours is an average estimated by a board of university or ministry. Of course, there are external degrees for people who could learn something at their own pace, but the number of such degrees is quite low. If universities can successfully graduate people based on averages is it inapplicable here? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#816 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH3QHHT7NPXBYEMPFURCPW3SSQKKDANCNFSM4TXZQVBQ .

No