Definitelytyped: Transition from `types-2.0` to `master`

Created on 9 Dec 2016  路  11Comments  路  Source: DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped

Next week we plan to begin publishing from master and ditch the types-2.0 branch. So we will do:

  • [x] Close all master PRs. (remaining)
  • [x] Shut down types-publisher temporarily.
  • [x] Do a final merge from master to types-2.0.
  • [x] Merge from types-2.0 to master.
  • [x] Turn types-publisher back on, this time publishing from master.

Should I start submitting new pull requests to master?

Not yet. We're clearing out pull requests for master.

Can I still submit pull requests to types-2.0?

Yes. After we switch to using master, we'll do regular merges from types-2.0 to master.
But, once the merge has happened (you'll know because this issue is closed), you should prefer to make new pull requests to master.

Most helpful comment

Deleted the types-2.0 branch.

All 11 comments

@andy-ms , in light of https://github.com/Microsoft/types-publisher/issues/214#issuecomment-266056954, do you think we could discuss having types-publisher publish from "stable" and allowing changes for things like Typescript 2.1 go to master? OR to create a types-2.1?

See the next comment (https://github.com/Microsoft/types-publisher/issues/214#issuecomment-266126733); we'd like to have just one branch.

//CC @blakeembrey, @alexeagle, @vvakame, @johnnyreilly, @staxmanade,@Diullei, @RyanCavanaugh and @DanielRosenwasser

Thanks for the heads up @mhegazy

It's all done. We will accept (and prefer) pull requests to master now.

have the changes for adding autoHide and endDate to Jqueryui/index.d.ts been committed and merged with Master ?

@Mukesh1303 yes.

Why not delete the types-2.0 branch? (and some other old branches)

We have to clear out all the PRs still targeting it first.

Deleted the types-2.0 branch.

@andy-ms @types/callsite is still pointing to types-2.0 in it's package description.

I assume just triggering a new publish would resolve that? Can that be done w/o making an actual change to the package?

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings