Right now when the command fails, it prints the whole stack trace. Is it really necessary?
I'm open to hearing arguments or PRs to improve this functionality. Currently we give you everything because a git hook including test output may have failed and we want you to see which tests failed.
It adds a lot of noise and is not very informative. See:
Trying to git cz with empty index:
.../node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87
throw new Error('No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?');
^
Error: No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?
at .../node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87:13
at .../node_modules/commitizen/dist/commitizen/staging.js:25:5
at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:197:7)
at emitTwo (events.js:106:13)
at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:194:7)
at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:899:16)
at Socket.<anonymous> (internal/child_process.js:342:11)
at emitOne (events.js:96:13)
at Socket.emit (events.js:191:7)
at Pipe._handle.close [as _onclose] (net.js:511:12)
Combined with a commit-msg hook:
nps executing: conventional-changelog-lint -e
⧗ input: feat: foo.
✖ message may not end with full stop [subject-full-stop]
✖ found 1 problems, 0 warnings
The script called "lint.commit" which runs "conventional-changelog-lint -e" failed with exit code 1 https://github.com/kentcdodds/nps/blob/v5.1.0/other/ERRORS_AND_WARNINGS.md#failed-with-exit-code
> husky - commit-msg hook failed (add --no-verify to bypass)
> husky - to debug, use 'npm run commitmsg'
.../node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:102
throw error;
^
Error: git exited with error code 1
at ChildProcess.<anonymous> (.../node_modules/commitizen/dist/git/commit.js:50:26)
at emitTwo (events.js:106:13)
at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:194:7)
at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (internal/child_process.js:215:12)
All these errors should be handled IMO and turned into non-zero exit with just the error message printed.
Fair enough. Would you be interested in putting in a PR?
--
Jim ForCy
On May 15, 2017 at 8:03:07 AM, Łukasz Moroz ([email protected])
wrote:
It adds a lot of noise and is not very informative. See:
Trying to git cz with empty index:
.../node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87
throw new Error('No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?');
^Error: No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?
at .../node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87:13
at .../node_modules/commitizen/dist/commitizen/staging.js:25:5
at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:197:7)
at emitTwo (events.js:106:13)
at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:194:7)
at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:899:16)
at Socket.(internal/child_process.js:342:11)
at emitOne (events.js:96:13)
at Socket.emit (events.js:191:7)
at Pipe._handle.close [as _onclose] (net.js:511:12)Combined with a commit-msg hook:
nps executing: conventional-changelog-lint -e
⧗ input: feat: foo.
✖ message may not end with full stop [subject-full-stop]
✖ found 1 problems, 0 warnings
The script called "lint.commit" which runs "conventional-changelog-lint -e" failed with exit code 1 https://github.com/kentcdodds/nps/blob/v5.1.0/other/ERRORS_AND_WARNINGS.md#failed-with-exit-codehusky - commit-msg hook failed (add --no-verify to bypass)
husky - to debug, use 'npm run commitmsg'
.../node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:102
throw error;
^Error: git exited with error code 1
at ChildProcess.(.../node_modules/commitizen/dist/git/commit.js:50:26)
at emitTwo (events.js:106:13)
at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:194:7)
at Process.ChildProcess._handle.onexit (internal/child_process.js:215:12)All these errors should be handled IMO and turned into non-zero exit with
just the error message printed.—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/commitizen/cz-cli/issues/436#issuecomment-301468194,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGpijy6GMBFsHSfNLLkK8i0yCxBqpwqks5r6E0LgaJpZM4Navxs
.
Sure
[email protected] this is still in right?
/usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87
throw new Error('No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?');
^
Error: No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?
at /usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87:13
at /usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/commitizen/staging.js:25:5
at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:267:7)
at emitTwo (events.js:126:13)
at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:214:7)
at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:925:16)
at Socket.stream.socket.on (internal/child_process.js:346:11)
at emitOne (events.js:116:13)
at Socket.emit (events.js:211:7)
at Pipe._handle.close [as _onclose] (net.js:554:12)
@bm-stschneider don.t think so. This was merged by never published? /cc @jimthedev
/usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87
throw new Error('No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?');
^
Error: No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?
at /usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87:13
at /usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/commitizen/staging.js:25:5
at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:264:7)
at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:160:13)
at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:943:16)
at Socket.stream.socket.on (internal/child_process.js:363:11)
at Socket.emit (events.js:160:13)
at Pipe._handle.close [as _onclose] (net.js:562:12)
@bm-stschneider, @raisedadead and @jimthedev.
Is this right?
Did you run got add myfile.md first?
On February 17, 2018 at 9:05:26 AM, Vinícius Carvalho (
[email protected]) wrote:
/usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87
throw new Error('No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?');
^Error: No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add?
at /usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/cli/strategies/git-cz.js:87:13
at /usr/local/lib/node_modules/commitizen/dist/commitizen/staging.js:25:5
at ChildProcess.exithandler (child_process.js:264:7)
at ChildProcess.emit (events.js:160:13)
at maybeClose (internal/child_process.js:943:16)
at Socket.stream.socket.on (internal/child_process.js:363:11)
at Socket.emit (events.js:160:13)
at Pipe._handle.close [as _onclose] (net.js:562:12)@bm-stschneider https://github.com/bm-stschneider, @raisedadead
https://github.com/raisedadead and @jimthedev
https://github.com/jimthedev.Is this right?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/commitizen/cz-cli/issues/436#issuecomment-366447116,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGpijDkNQ5ZNkr-0VZiLrTu9YaA6UaRks5tVuq2gaJpZM4Navxs
.
No, you would replace that with your file that you want to commit. Or you
could use git add . for all changed files.
--
Jim ForCy
On February 17, 2018 at 10:06:05 AM, Vinícius Carvalho (
[email protected]) wrote:
Sorry but I do not know this file, where could I find it?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/commitizen/cz-cli/issues/436#issuecomment-366451006,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGpio0e22A2yzE6xW7FRo0l7QB-3vhNks5tVvjtgaJpZM4Navxs
.
Sorry but I do not know this file, where could I find it?
If you're talking about adding the file in the git stage, myfile.md being a file from my project, that's not what I'm talking about.
My question has to do with why the exit is not treated to show a more friendly and easy-to-understand message
Please see https://github.com/commitizen/cz-cli/issues/436#issuecomment-301452208 which explains that we are open to a PR for better functionality but at the moment we give everything since it is helpful when running in a git hook scenario. I will point out that Error: No files added to staging! Did you forget to run git add? is right there. How would you prefer the message to be written? Please offer suggestions.
@jimthedev,
Thanks for explanation and calm, had not seen the explanation above, sorry for this. I will consider creating PR soon enough.
keep up the good work! =]
Most helpful comment
@jimthedev,
Thanks for explanation and calm, had not seen the explanation above, sorry for this. I will consider creating PR soon enough.
keep up the good work! =]