The term "development environment", "test environment" and "production environment" is used differently across the contexts and sometimes cause confusion for users.
create-react-app defines the environment name by the state of app code build: "development" means the code is not minified and run in live reload mode on local machines, "test" means the code is executing in unit test process, "production" means the code is minified and optimized with source map. I'll call this "development build", "test build" and "production build".
Mean while, in large portion of the software industry, these terms are used differently:

In the diagram above, I'll call them deploy environment, each deploy environment is a set of all the services that linked and worked with each other in an isolated place (servers/VPN).
"Frontend" is where create-react-app lives, and this all run "production build" of the app, which means the code is minified and optimized.
Regarding this document: https://github.com/facebook/create-react-app/blob/master/packages/react-scripts/template/README.md#adding-custom-environment-variables
NODE_ENV always resolves to production when built with yarn build, even if we try to run NODE_ENV=staging yarn build.yarn build-staging, yarn build-production,... In the script, it creates .env file according the deployment environment and build. Ex: mv env/staging.env ./.env && yarn build.https://staging-my-app.com/env)What is the best practice here? Have anyone of you run into this problem? How did you do it? Should create-react-app do something about this? Please share, thanks!
You described the situation well 馃檪
The default use of NODE_ENV is intentional and is solely used to distinguish between local development builds, unit tests, and optimized production builds. You can think of 'production' as a generic "distribution" build, not necessarily a build literally destined for a public-facing production server.
As you mentioned, it is common to have a few types of server environments for an application. These should all run the optimized NODE_ENV=production build, so that you can test your app with production-level performance. In order to programmatically differentiate between environments at runtime, you'll need to use a different environment variable, something other than NODE_ENV.
Create-react-app mandates that you prefix any custom environment variables with REACT_APP_. You can set custom prefixed environment variables from a CLI, see this section of the readme. In Bash for example, you could run:
REACT_APP_DIST_ENV=staging yarn build
You can access the variable in your app with process.env.REACT_APP_DIST_ENV. For example:
if (process.env.REACT_APP_DIST_ENV === 'staging') {
analytics.setEnvironment('staging');
}
I haven't personally tried this with create-react-app, but check out the cross-env package. It allows setting environment variables in a cross-platform manner. You could then simplify your package.json scripts to something like this:
"build:staging": "cross-env REACT_APP_DIST_ENV=staging && yarn build"
Then run yarn build:staging on any machine to compile an optimized build ready to be deployed on a staging server.
The easiest way to achieve this is via .env files, injecting each variable you'd like to use in your app, most close to your second solution.
Instead, create one for each environment.
.env.staging
REACT_APP_API_URL=http://api-stg.example.com
.env.qa
REACT_APP_API_URL=http://api-qa.example.com
Then you can just add some extra scripts in your package.json:
{
"scripts": {
"build:staging": "env-cmd .env.staging yarn build",
"build:qa": "env-cmd .env.qa yarn build"
}
}
In this scenario, .env.production would only be used for fallback if a variable isn't specified in .env.staging or .env.qa.
Hi i'd like to do this.
But as a quick note, basically what I am going to do is edit the docs to state what you guys just stated in a higher level way?
Should I simply do so, with say, a few sentences and a short code snippet or ought I be more detailed?
I'd say add a section under "Building for Relative Paths" in "Deployment" named "Building for Multiple Environments" and then give a more doc-y explanation of the solution I gave above.
I'd make it a bit more detailed.
Great, going to start working on it today
@Timer Good guy , That is good idea , tks.
Documentation added in #4117.
Most helpful comment
The easiest way to achieve this is via
.envfiles, injecting each variable you'd like to use in your app, most close to your second solution.Instead, create one for each environment.
.env.staging.env.qaThen you can just add some extra scripts in your
package.json:In this scenario,
.env.productionwould only be used for fallback if a variable isn't specified in.env.stagingor.env.qa.