Hi all,
# docker-compose -v
docker-compose version 1.8.0-rc2, build c72c966
I am trying to use one docker-compose.yml file to start mutliple multi-container services. So far, so good. The containers comprising one service share a data volume and this is where I am having some trouble.
I would like my docker-compose.yml file to look something like this:
version: '2'
services:
php:
image: dpavlotzky/wordpress_php:4.6
volumes:
- ${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}:/data
nginx:
image: dpavlotzky/wordpress_nginx:4.6
depends_on:
- php
environment:
- SERVICE_80_NAME=wordpress
- SERVICE_443_IGNORE=true
- SERVICE_TAGS=${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}
volumes:
- ${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}:/data:ro
mariadb:
image: dpavlotzky/mariadb
volumes:
- ${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}:/data
volumes:
${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}:
Every service uses a data volume named after the project name. This usually is a url (e.g. www.test.com).
But this does not work unfortunately:
# COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME=www.test.com docker-compose up
ERROR: The Compose file './docker-compose.yml' is invalid because:
volumes value Additional properties are not allowed ('${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}' was unexpected)
So then I tried this:
version: '2'
services:
php:
image: dpavlotzky/wordpress_php:4.6
volumes:
- my_volume:/data
nginx:
image: dpavlotzky/wordpress_nginx:4.6
depends_on:
- php
environment:
- SERVICE_80_NAME=wordpress
- SERVICE_443_IGNORE=true
- SERVICE_TAGS=${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}
volumes:
- my_volume:/data:ro
mariadb:
image: dpavlotzky/mariadb
volumes:
- my_volume:/data
volumes:
my_volume:
name: ${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}
# COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME=www.test.com docker-compose up
ERROR: The Compose file './docker-compose.yml' is invalid because:
volumes.my_volume value Additional properties are not allowed ('name' was unexpected)
The name trick seems to only work for external volumes...
I now work around this with a shell script that first creates a named volume (if it does not exist yet) with the COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME as name and then creates a YAML file with COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME as name:
version: '2'
volumes:
www.test.com:
external: true
and I include that using:
COMPOSE_FILE=docker-compose.yml:${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}.yml
But I am actually hoping I could get by without the scripting...
Thank you for creating docker and docker-compose!
David
Hi David, what you're trying to do seems redundant to me given the fact that non-external volumes will already be namespaced using the project name. You can just call your data volume my_volume
and there won't be any conflict.
Hope that helps!
Ahhh... that will do. Thanks for pointing that out shin-!
@shin- @dpavlotzky Same problem here.
Using different docker-compose files:
For example:
docker-compose-1.yml
...
volumes:
api:
mongo_data:
...
and
docker-compose-2.yml
...
volumes:
api:
external: true
mongo_data:
external: true
...
I got this error:
ERROR: Volume api declared as external, but could not be found. Please create the volume manually using docker volume create --name=api and try again.
I fixed it creating an .env file with content:
COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME=myproject
and changing:
docker-compose-2.yml
...
volumes:
api:
external:
name: "${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}_api"
mongo_data:
external:
name: "${COMPOSE_PROJECT_NAME}_mongo_data"
...
I'm wondering if there's any way to substitude volume names from .env
I would have been interested in a solution for this to support variables in volume, network, container and service names, as it makes the docker-compose.yml very reusable in the presence of one deployment per customer, but I understand that there are other ways to do it.
This particular use case was solved in the 3.4 file format. You still can't use volume keys with environment variables, but you can specify their external names at the top-level like this:
volumes:
dbstorage:
name: appname_db_${RAILS_ENV:-development}
services:
db:
volumes:
- dbstorage:/var/lib/postgresql/data
# etc.
It might be more precise than using external because it will create non-existent volumes.
Most helpful comment
I would have been interested in a solution for this to support variables in volume, network, container and service names, as it makes the docker-compose.yml very reusable in the presence of one deployment per customer, but I understand that there are other ways to do it.