According to the Material Design Typography spec, buttons and the app bar should have medium font weights. However, if the correct Roboto fonts are included, they appear bold. This does not appear on the Angular Material site because the Roboto 500 font weight is not included.
The button and toolbar typography should have a font weight of 400.


The button and toolbar font weight is set to 500


<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto:300,400,500" rel="stylesheet">To align with material spec.
angular: 5.0.0
material: 5.0.0
Downstream issue Teradata/covalent#1012
500 is the medium font weight. Google Fonts for reference:

@andrewseguin I see you closed the issue, but the official Material Design site and Polymer paper toolbar use font-weight:400 for toolbars
https://material.io/guidelines/components/toolbars.html

https://www.webcomponents.org/element/PolymerElements/paper-toolbar/demo/demo/index.html

Are those two wrong?
Also, the Angular Material site isn't even loading the 500 weight, it uses <link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Roboto|Roboto+Mono:300" rel="stylesheet"> which has the appearance of 400

Is that wrong as well?
Apologies - read the thread incorrectly, re-opening for investigation
@kyleledbetter I think that this is open to interpretation since there are no exact values in the mockups. While the official site does use 400 for the toolbar, MDC, which is the Material implementation that they're linking to, uses 500 as a font weight. Closing the issue for now, but we can keep the discussion going.
@crisbeto fair points, the thing that's driving me nuts is that 500 in MDC's toolbar is rendering differently than 500 in Angular Material's toolbar... but i can't figure out why
¯_(ツ)_/¯ i'll keep researching
This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.
Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.
_This action has been performed automatically by a bot._
Most helpful comment
Apologies - read the thread incorrectly, re-opening for investigation