Cockatrice: Clicking "OK" on anti-idle message does not make you not-idle.

Created on 10 Mar 2017  路  5Comments  路  Source: Cockatrice/Cockatrice

Title, I have to assume this is a bug. Likewise, typing and sending messages in direct chat also does not make the server consider you "not-idle".

Most helpful comment

I consider pressing the "OK" button not taking an action, so not necessarily a bug.

I'm wondering why you wouldn't, clicking "OK" requires you to be viewing the client and, physically, not-idle. Is there a reason to not consider it an action?

Sending a message in private chat, however, should count towards not being idle.

I can speak from experience this is not the case, I've tested it with Jinete before.

All 5 comments

I consider pressing the "OK" button not taking an action, so not necessarily a bug. Sending a message in private chat, however, should count towards not being idle.

I consider pressing the "OK" button not taking an action, so not necessarily a bug.

I'm wondering why you wouldn't, clicking "OK" requires you to be viewing the client and, physically, not-idle. Is there a reason to not consider it an action?

Sending a message in private chat, however, should count towards not being idle.

I can speak from experience this is not the case, I've tested it with Jinete before.

But using main chat is considered an action @A4G ?

@tooomm Correct.

Is there a reason to not consider it an action?

Yes, you're not doing anything on the server. Also there's no system in place for the client to tell the server that it clicked ok.

Sending a message in private chat, however, should count towards not being idle.

If this isn't the case we should fix it.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

tooomm picture tooomm  路  6Comments

TheMasterpass picture TheMasterpass  路  4Comments

skwerlman picture skwerlman  路  6Comments

poixen picture poixen  路  4Comments

MarcusTrevino picture MarcusTrevino  路  7Comments