Cmak: Partitions Covered & Negative Lag

Created on 16 Oct 2019  ·  2Comments  ·  Source: yahoo/CMAK

Can someone explain why KM reports partitions covered as 0%? Also, why would there be a negative lag?

image

kafka-manager: 1.3.3.22
kafka: 2.0.1
zookeeper: 3.4.9

Thanks!

All 2 comments

Nobody? Even if it's a pretentious comment pointing me to documentation that I missed? :)

The negative lag is probably a CMAK bug, where data is fetched from the kafka clusters in different times and in between messages were consumed (ie: get topic offset, then get consumer offset 1 second after). If the fetch order were reversed, the lag would be always positive, but also probably always higher than reality if the messages are quickly consumed.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

josephfrancis picture josephfrancis  ·  5Comments

rudrasharma picture rudrasharma  ·  6Comments

ghost picture ghost  ·  5Comments

BDeus picture BDeus  ·  5Comments

dongbin86 picture dongbin86  ·  3Comments