At present, synchronization is based on database in MaterializeMySQL engine. However, there are many tables under a database. there may be very few tables that need to be synchronized to CH for analysis. so, It is useless and waste of resources to synchronize unneeded tables. if can support table based synchronization for MaterializeMySQL, It will be more flexible and effective
Yes, it's very useful.
There are two ways implement this:
can it support sync the views of mysql table, such as some columns,rows of a table?
@zhang2014
Good idea, thanks for your effort, and hope this function can be realized soon
@zhang2014
Have the function of support MaterializeMySQL table engine already began to do it?
Most helpful comment
Yes, it's very useful.
There are two ways implement this: