_From [email protected] on December 08, 2012 18:52:48_
What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. Start Clementine
_Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/clementine-player/issues/detail?id=3344_
_From arnaud.bienner on December 08, 2012 10:38:43_
This change has been introduced in revision 7058d238fb7b .
John, do you think we really need so many processes?
Owner: john.maguire
_From john.maguire on December 08, 2012 13:38:01_
Unless there's a quantifiable reason not to (and 8MB of RAM is nothing), I prefer this due to its better performance.
Status: WontFix
_From [email protected] on December 08, 2012 13:49:11_
Fair enough. I suppose that the fact that haivng 8 idle processes sitting around doing nothing annoys me is not a quantifiable reason. =)
It just seemed a bit wasteful or resources to me, and I assumed this was not intended behaviour. If it is, it's not worth getting riled up about.
_From arnaud.bienner on September 11, 2013 11:29:35_
Issue 3852 has been merged into this issue.
_From davidsansome on October 15, 2013 17:31:00_
Issue 3896 has been merged into this issue.
_From arnaud.bienner on November 20, 2013 02:08:55_
Issue 3972 has been merged into this issue.
Seems a bit wasteful to me to have 8 processes hanging around doing nothing most of the time. Why not spawn them when they are needed and then kill them off when they have finished?
On my Windows 7 box they are using 5Mb each, so that's 40Mb.
this is insane I have got 16 of them CPU 5960x

I got 12 :s this is not right...
On my four processor system these processes together use about 70 MB of RAM, nearly as much as Clementine itself. Seeing a long process list in top isn't nice either.
Why not start these processes on demand when they are needed?
Most helpful comment
Seems a bit wasteful to me to have 8 processes hanging around doing nothing most of the time. Why not spawn them when they are needed and then kill them off when they have finished?
On my Windows 7 box they are using 5Mb each, so that's 40Mb.