Please follow the steps below and check the boxes with [x] once you did the step.
Please provide information about your system and the version of Clementine used.
Clementine says installing Spotify plugin, then crashes.
Click Spotify.
I've just loaded up the 1.3.1 version to try this out.
I'd be tempted to say that you have a missing library, have a look at the full list of dependancies here
Also try running from terminal and see if your output is similar to mine or if anything else appears
I have this as my console output:
20:01:14.698 INFO SpotifyBlobDownloader:91 Downloading QUrl( "https://spotify.clementine-player.org/version16-64bit/blob" )
20:01:14.698 INFO SpotifyBlobDownloader:91 Downloading QUrl( "https://spotify.clementine-player.org/version16-64bit/blob.sha512" )
20:01:14.699 INFO SpotifyBlobDownloader:91 Downloading QUrl( "https://spotify.clementine-player.org/version16-64bit/libspotify.so.12.1.51" )
20:01:14.699 INFO SpotifyBlobDownloader:91 Downloading QUrl( "https://spotify.clementine-player.org/version16-64bit/libspotify.so.12.1.51.sha512" )
20:01:18.894 DEBUG SpotifyBlobDownloader:212 Verifying "blob" against "blob.sha512" true
20:01:18.910 DEBUG SpotifyBlobDownloader:212 Verifying "libspotify.so.12.1.51" against "libspotify.so.12.1.51.sha512" true
20:01:18.910 INFO SpotifyBlobDownloader:146 Writing "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/blob"
20:01:18.911 INFO SpotifyBlobDownloader:146 Writing "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/libspotify.so.12.1.51"
20:01:18.913 DEBUG SpotifyBlobDownloader:165 Linking "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/libspotify.so.12.1.51" to "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/libspotify.so"
20:01:18.913 DEBUG SpotifyBlobDownloader:165 Linking "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/libspotify.so.12.1.51" to "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/libspotify.so.12"
20:01:18.913 DEBUG SpotifyBlobDownloader:165 Linking "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/libspotify.so.12.1.51" to "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/libspotify.so.12.1"
20:01:18.914 INFO SpotifyService:356 Starting "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotifyblob/version16-64bit/blob"
20:01:18.936 DEBUG SpotifyClient:84 Using: "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotify-cache" for Spotify cache
20:01:18.936 DEBUG SpotifyClient:86 Using: "/home/nathan/.config/Clementine/spotify-settings" for Spotify settings
20:01:18.936 DEBUG SpotifyClient:114 Connecting to port 38745
20:01:18.936 INFO SpotifyServer:53 Connection from port 60066
20:01:18.937 DEBUG SpotifyClient:321 Setting playback settings: bitrate 1 normalisation false
20:01:18.937 WARN SpotifyClient:343 Tried to relogin but no stored credentials
I have the same issue, also on Arch Linux with Clementine 1.3.1-3. The referenced symbol seems to be part of crypto++, which I have installed (5.6.5-2).
~/.c/Clementine ❯❯❯ clementine --verbose ⏎
19:41:00.160 WARN unknown libpng warning: iCCP: known incorrect sRGB profile
19:41:00.191 WARN unknown QxtGlobalShortcut failed to register: "Media Next"
19:41:00.191 WARN unknown QxtGlobalShortcut failed to register: "Media Play"
19:41:00.191 WARN unknown QxtGlobalShortcut failed to register: "Media Previous"
19:41:00.191 WARN unknown QxtGlobalShortcut failed to register: "Media Stop"
19:41:00.304 WARN unknown QPainter::begin: Paint device returned engine == 0, type: 2
clementine: symbol lookup error: clementine: undefined symbol: _ZN8CryptoPP6SHA5129InitStateEPy
Seems to be a problem with crypto++, I just downgraded the package to 5.6.4 and everything is working ok. I'm gonna post the bug in their repo.
I would suppose the problem is that the arch maintainer built clementine against cryptopp 5.6.4, while the current version in the repos is 5.6.5
Seems to be solved: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/commit/trunk?h=packages/clementine&id=12af6a0cac31e9912cc36bcbddea2128f4001b7a (bug tracker: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/51718).
It's weird crypto++ broke the ABI with a patch version.
It's weird crypto++ broke the ABI with a patch version.
Yes, we fumbled the 5.6.5 release. More correctly, I fumbled it. Our sincerest apologies for that.
If interested, more of the back story is we caught Issue 277/CVE-2016-7420. It was a procedural finding that effectively said, _"You did not tell someone they needed to defined NDEBUG for release builds"_. Someone who did not do it was in risk of an assert, which could egress data from the app's security boundary into another's boundary, like Apple, Google, Microsoft or Ubuntu by way of Error Reporting. We cleared the issue in 6 commits over a few days. After the six or so commits, the instance problem was solved.
Stepping back to 10,000 feet, we recognized the bigger problem was (1) the library did not ship in the recommended or "best state", (2) users needed to do something special to get into a recommended or "best state", and (3) users needed to RTFM to figure out what the best state was. The short of that is, _"If RTFM was going to work, then it would have happened by now"_.
At 5.6.5 we shipped the library in the recommended or "best state". Effectively, we sacrificed distros for users. It was an awful decision to make and it really bothered everyone who is part of the Crypto++ project. We knew someone was going to get the pointy end of the stick.
We _thought_ we had nearly all of the bases covered the 5.6.5. We knew 5.6.5 needed a recompile to vet the asserts and we thought the recompile would massage out any problems because symbols were _not_ being removed. However, we wrong because we are here (_q.v._).
If interested, here's where Debian, Fedora and Gentoo experienced the pain point (Clementine was added to the list):
If interested, we maintain a wiki page for Distributions. The section Post-Release Patches has a handful of bug reports you might be interested in. I try to keep commits coupled tightly to a report, so you should not have any trouble cherry picking. I strongly encourage Clementine to cherry-pick the changes for Crypto++ Issue 283 and Crypto++ 332. As far as I know, they are the two "symbol problems" for 5.6.5.
Finally, I also maintain a private mailing list for distros and other interested parties. Its very low volume and only makes contact with maintainers and packagers when necessary. If you want to be added to the discussions, then email me at _noloader, gmail account_.
Most helpful comment
Yes, we fumbled the 5.6.5 release. More correctly, I fumbled it. Our sincerest apologies for that.
If interested, more of the back story is we caught Issue 277/CVE-2016-7420. It was a procedural finding that effectively said, _"You did not tell someone they needed to defined
NDEBUGfor release builds"_. Someone who did not do it was in risk of anassert, which could egress data from the app's security boundary into another's boundary, like Apple, Google, Microsoft or Ubuntu by way of Error Reporting. We cleared the issue in 6 commits over a few days. After the six or so commits, the instance problem was solved.Stepping back to 10,000 feet, we recognized the bigger problem was (1) the library did not ship in the recommended or "best state", (2) users needed to do something special to get into a recommended or "best state", and (3) users needed to RTFM to figure out what the best state was. The short of that is, _"If RTFM was going to work, then it would have happened by now"_.
At 5.6.5 we shipped the library in the recommended or "best state". Effectively, we sacrificed distros for users. It was an awful decision to make and it really bothered everyone who is part of the Crypto++ project. We knew someone was going to get the pointy end of the stick.
We _thought_ we had nearly all of the bases covered the 5.6.5. We knew 5.6.5 needed a recompile to vet the
assertsand we thought the recompile would massage out any problems because symbols were _not_ being removed. However, we wrong because we are here (_q.v._).If interested, here's where Debian, Fedora and Gentoo experienced the pain point (Clementine was added to the list):
If interested, we maintain a wiki page for Distributions. The section Post-Release Patches has a handful of bug reports you might be interested in. I try to keep commits coupled tightly to a report, so you should not have any trouble cherry picking. I strongly encourage Clementine to cherry-pick the changes for Crypto++ Issue 283 and Crypto++ 332. As far as I know, they are the two "symbol problems" for 5.6.5.
Finally, I also maintain a private mailing list for distros and other interested parties. Its very low volume and only makes contact with maintainers and packagers when necessary. If you want to be added to the discussions, then email me at _noloader, gmail account_.