Chocolatey-coreteampackages: Make it very clear that the `putty` package is non-standard

[jacktose]

It seems clear from #1177 that [putty] will continue to install [putty.portable] for backwards compatibility.
It's also clear from the repeated issues, comments, etc., and the FAQ, that users expect it to install [putty.install], as with most packages.

Therefore, we should make every effort to clarify that [putty] violates that expectation, and to direct users to consider [putty.install].
I think it warrants highly visible text on at least [putty]'s web page, choco info text, and installer output.

[joel0]

I agree with this! When I was new to Chocolatey, I assumed something went wrong with the putty install or that the package was broken when the Start menu entry was missing. It took a long time to understand that the dependency of putty.portable found below the fold was the "problem".

[majkinetor]

Added to meta package notes, will be public after next update.

[ExE-Boss]

You might want to merge #1331 before then.

[jacktose]

The note is nice, but I disagree that it resolves my issue.

I think it warrants highly visible text on at least putty's web page, choco info text, and installer output.

Most people aren't going to read all the notes before installing.

[cinderblock]

Still think the correct solution is to make putty depend on putty.install like nearly every other Chocolately package.