This meta-issue tracks improvements we'd like to make to pre-merge testing (Travis CI), which executes the test script: util/buildRelease/smokeTest
make mason support.futures tracking (#4964)chplspell support (#6731)pylint support.notestTEST_COMMAND=\"make test-venv && CHPL_HOME=$PWD ./util/run-in-venv.bash ./util/test/check_annotations.py\" to know that line is for annotations, for instance)make docs support (PR: #6921)lookForBadAlloc support (PR: #6917)annotate.py support (#4998) (PR: #6917)A small correction to my earlier estimate -- because we already build chpldoc in the Travis CI testing, building the docs would add an additional ~30 seconds to the testing time.
I'd also be in support of adding a python linter as well as running util/devel/lookForBadAlloc (#6163)
When discussing adding make docs to the testing, some suggested adding it as a separate Travis CI job that runs in parallel. Because chpldoc requires a built compiler, a separate job for chpldoc and make docs would not save a significant amount of time.
I think this optimization may be useful for us in the future, especially as we beef up Travis CI testing. However, I don't think it's necessary for adding make docs, or any of the other changes listed in this issue (assuming they run relatively quickly).
For reference, make docs would add ~30 seconds of build time, and current build times fluctuate between 2-4 minutes.
Running make docs as a concurrent travis build with https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/6921
We weren't building chpldoc as part of the travis testing before, so doing make docs would have added 90-120 seconds to the travis build.
Added a link to an issue for running the .graph/GRAPHFILES checks that we do as part of start_test -- https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/issues/6422
Low priority: added a line about make the configurations more visually distinct, because looking at this isn't helpful when I just want to know what the build is that is still running -

Low priority: added a line about make the configurations more visually distinct, because looking at this isn't helpful when I just want to know what the build is that is still running -
Done in https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/10420

Github actions (github's CI) is out of beta as of today. Might be worth looking at to see if there's any concrete benefits for us over Travis
It looks like github actions has more than just CI, so I've forked that to https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/issues/14442
Added make mason to the wish list after @e-kayrakli discovered a deprecation warning in mason that has gone unnoticed for a while (doesn't cause an error in nightly testing).
https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/14985 is another case where mason broke on master due to lack of make mason in Travis CI
This should probably be updated/repurposed for Github Actions world.
Most helpful comment
Done in https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/pull/10420