Hey, this project looks great.
Just a suggestion for a new component: modal windows. This is the components I use the most in twitter bootstrap and like me many people so it would be great to have one in bulma. It should have a header with a title and an optional close icon, a body and a footer with buttons.
PS: awesome project
gimenete
All 12 comments
looking for this feature which makes me to use this framework in the upcoming project of ours.
nareshv
on 2 Feb 2016
JavaScript plugins are coming up. I could design a modal, but without the JS interaction, it might be useless. So it's on hold for now, but in the pipelines.
jgthms
on 2 Feb 2016
Need to have a directive for Angular JS also !
elmor34
on 2 Feb 2016
@jgthms well, it's not necessary useless because some people (like me) could use only the CSS and then add the behavior using another framework. For example for bootstrap there's the official JS implementation using jquery but there are others using react or vuejs.
In other projects I've used bootstrap components without the official javascript and I've just added/removed the proper css classes to open dropdowns, menus, show/hide tabs, etc. myself without using the official jquery implementation because I was using a different framework.
gimenete
on 2 Feb 2016
:+1: on having a model separate from the JS framework. I'd rather not be forced to use a particular front-end framework just to get a modal window!
3noch
on 2 Feb 2016
An opinion about modal windows:
- Breaks the UI/IUX
- Anything possible to do inside a modal is just possible to do in the main layout (And will result in a much better flow for the user)
- Using a modal window is failing as a designer
- I hate them
Do you want include them in the project? Ok, but just the CSS as @jgthms says, or at least dont add JS dependency.
I would also suggest to make elements for:
- Floating window with darked background
- Panel
- Panel Header
- Panel Footer
And then, the modal window would be a combination of them.
sirikon
on 2 Feb 2016
I would repeat @3noch comment!
wellguimaraes
on 3 Feb 2016
:+1: for having the CSS separate from the JS that runs it!
michaelcontento
on 3 Feb 2016
+1 for just having the CSS, but with proper classes for animations and transition states
onlymejosh
on 3 Feb 2016
+1 @3noch
arthurkirsz
on 9 Feb 2016
Modals have been added. As wished, you have to handle the show/hide yourself. But it's just toggling 1 CSS class.
jgthms
on 16 Feb 2016
Yay!
3noch
on 16 Feb 2016
Related issues
bigZ-again
路
3Comments
NurdinDev
路
3Comments
JenCant
路
3Comments
fundon
路
3Comments
guillecro
路
3Comments
Most helpful comment
:+1: on having a model separate from the JS framework. I'd rather not be forced to use a particular front-end framework just to get a modal window!