Browser-compat-data: Migrate remaining CSS compat data

Created on 28 Aug 2018  路  17Comments  路  Source: mdn/browser-compat-data

This might not be everything remaining in terms of CSS compat data, but it's all I've found so far.
Need to decide if we want to migrate this over, or merge into existing data, or delete the page, etc.

See below for an updated checklist, https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/issues/2684#issuecomment-421428277

data help wanted

Most helpful comment

7 CSS properties left to merge! 馃帀

All 17 comments

For most of the -moz- prefixed properties, I鈥檇 probably recommend moving those which aren鈥檛 exposed to the web under the /docs/Mozilla/ tree, like -moz-binding, which should go under /docs/Mozilla/Tech/XBL/, whereas those which are exposed to the web should probably remain under /docs/Web/CSS/ for now.

Also, ::-moz-placeholder has been made into a redirect to ::placeholder on 2018-08-20 (a week before this issue was opened).

Here's my WIP:

  • [x] azimuth (#2744)
  • [x] box-align (#2739)
  • [x] box-flex-group (#2740)
  • [x] box-lines (#2741)
  • [x] box-ordinal-group (#2742)
  • [x] box-suppress (#2743)
  • [x] contain (#2745)
  • [x] font-smooth (#2746)
  • [x] initial-letter-sign (#2747)
  • [x] line-height-step (#2749)
  • [ ] linear-gradient
  • [ ] radial-gradient
  • [ ] repeating-linear-gradient
  • [ ] repeating-radial-gradient

I鈥檝e now created the https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Mozilla/Gecko/Chrome/CSS page to complement @chrisdavidmills鈥檚 https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Mozilla/Gecko/Chrome/API page, to which internal CSS聽properties (eg. -moz-binding) can be moved to.

Should the -webkit-mask-composite article be merged into mask-composite? The APIs are very different, but they do have the same name.

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:-ms-input-placeholder was also redirected

Should the 鈥憌ebkit鈥憁ask鈥慶omposite article be merged into mask鈥慶omposite?

You answered your own question with:

The APIs are very different, but they do have the same name.

So no.

Here's the current checklist (checked means PR has been merged or the article has been redirected/deleted):

Hi i want to contribute to it , can any one help how can i get started ?

@championshuttler I think you meant to link #2853?

@connorshea yeah that one

Just submitted two PRs to aid with this issue, as shown right above this comment. There was one more that was on the spreadsheet linked on #2467 that wasn't here, which I am adding to #2874 now:

With that being said, it looks like everything now has an associated PR!

7 CSS properties left to merge! 馃帀

This is complete now :D

The max-block-size article needs to be updated. Other than that, the only pages remaining for CSS are pages without existing tables.

Thanks for the help everyone! :tada:

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

caugner picture caugner  路  4Comments

vinyldarkscratch picture vinyldarkscratch  路  3Comments

vinyldarkscratch picture vinyldarkscratch  路  3Comments

ghost picture ghost  路  3Comments

bershanskiy picture bershanskiy  路  3Comments