I'll keep posting new screenshots and/or related things to the website so that everyone can provide feedback.
_Ideas_ are welcome! :tada:



1. We need to decide that description line below Who are We?
2. The description of authors. Should I copy the GitHub profile description? If anyone wants, though, they can post their author-description right here.
The author name will be a link, so that's that.
@abhisheksoni27 I have a tool for that: https://github.com/IonicaBizau/github-org-members.js
I'm happy with my GitHub short bio as description.
I would suggest using the GitHub API (the above library) so things are a bit more dynamic.
@IonicaBizau Brilliant! :tada:
I think it's great. Does the library return profile descriptions? :thinking:
Actually, even if it doesn't as of now, it's easy, right? We just have to call the API again for each author, and grab the description text.
Maybe that was on the roadmap. :joy:
Does the library return profile descriptions?
If I'm not wrong they are called bio.
Right. There you go: https://developer.github.com/v3/users/#get-a-single-user
It doesn't return the bios... It could be a feature.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Abhishek Soni notifications@github.com
wrote:
@IonicaBizau https://github.com/ionicabizau Brilliant! ๐
I think it's great. Does the library return profile descriptions? ๐ค
โ
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
https://github.com/BrainJS/brain.js/issues/92#issuecomment-328036925,
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACu081MYHyzW75BPOG8TDB_FaWKfbhnhks5sgPligaJpZM4PL84Q
.
Exactly!
Seems doable to me. What do you think?
@abhisheksoni27 I'm just wondering if the new API (v4) can return the bios in the same call. My library already supports a source url. :grin:
Oh! GraphQL. Great. Let's try and figure out if that's possible.
It most certainly is possible.
query{
organization(login:"Brainjs") {
members(first:7) {
edges {
node {
name
bio
avatarUrl
}
}
}
}
}
Can you try running it? It returns an empty array for me because maybe I can't access that information since I am not the owner.
@abhisheksoni27 That indeed works, but fetches the public owners. GraphQL requires authentication. Maybe we can do it via v3 for now...
Right. Good catch. I am getting two members now, and they are listed as Public. Cool.
Anyway, I am fine with v3.
@IonicaBizau As it happens, even REST can't return private members. :thinking:
It can, but it needs the right scopes.
We can use the source option of my library which will fetch the data from a JSON file, but we will have to update that file from time to time.
Right! How about we provide it with an authentication token (which has to
be generated by one of the owners)? And then, when we query, we can see
the private members as well.
OR. Like you said, we can go ahead and use the source option to get data
from a pre-saved file. Whatever works.
Right! How about we provide it with an authentication token
No, we don't want to share the tokens!!!
Of course. But, Firebase. But yeah, too much hassle.

The form looks odd right now, but as we add more sections showcasing brain.js sorcery, it'll fall into place.
@abhisheksoni27 Do we really need a contact form? Maybe we can track those as issues (e.g. brainjs/hello/issues/new).
@IonicaBizau Sure. Great idea.
But I only put the form there so that people who want to connect with us, but are not necessarily on GitHub (yes, yes, potential sponsors :laughing: ), can.
I'd like to brainstorm demos we could show off at some point as well.
@robertleeplummerjr I think the time is now. Brainstorm! :thinking:
Here are some ideas ๐ก:
I'll edit this post if I find new ideas
Hey guys. I'm working on a MNIST demo using BrainJS. Will post it here when it's presentable.
love it!
@lunaroyster If you want, there is one on GitHub made by a Russian guy that works. ๐
what a great conversation guys!
i'm really glad you're talking about the demo. because it was cool at first to find an easy to use ml library for js, and the contrast decider is cool compared to coming up with an algorithm. but compared to what we expect from ai, not so much. it doesn't really help with branding, and makes brainjs look basic and impractical to more serious users. demos with different input and output types would be nice:
thanks for the hard work. bravo
Any update on this? This is still in progress?
still in progress
I don't have the source of the above. @abhisheksoni27, do you?
@robertleeplummerjr Here's the source for anyone who is interested: https://github.com/abhisheksoni27/brain.js/tree/gh-pages
Nice!
You wouldn't have any interest in helping finish it would you @abhisheksoni27?
Since this is abandoned, I will be working on this. Pogress will be followed in the project dashboard.
Most helpful comment