Boto3: Porting mturk module from boto to boto3
Are there any plans to port the mechanical turk module from python 2 boto to boto3?
rzlee
All 41 comments
We don't have any immediate plans to port mechanical turk to boto3, but I'll mark this as a feature request.
jamesls
on 14 Jul 2015
Seconding this request — MTurk support is essential for my needs.
suchow
on 28 Sep 2015
+1, please port.
baykovr
on 6 Oct 2015
+1 important feature
machuiwen
on 13 Nov 2015
+1
revmischa
on 24 Nov 2015
+1
akats
on 5 Feb 2016
+1
flux627
on 16 Mar 2016
+1 because the current version does not support multiple locale qualifications
regata
on 18 Mar 2016
+1
oTree-org
on 18 Mar 2016
+1
margru
on 23 Mar 2016
:+1:
jhamrick
on 31 Mar 2016
+1
twiecki
on 1 Apr 2016
@jamesls My company is giving me some bandwidth to work on OS in the next few of weeks - is this something you'd be interested in receiving contributions for?
chrisconley
on 19 Apr 2016
After digging a bit, it looks like json files need to be generated in botocore, which are usually generated internally due to internal knowledge of the AWS services.
I'd still love to contribute if there's anything I can do.
chrisconley
on 22 Apr 2016
@jamesls, as it is not a priority for you, could you please explain to us what is necessary to do to contribute, or be able to use boto or boto3 with mturk?
Is it better/easier to migrate boto module to python3, or to migrate it to boto3 (is it possible as it looks the project architecture is different).
Here is boto mturk module: https://github.com/boto/boto/tree/develop/boto/mturk
And here are the guidelines to migrate boto module to python3: http://boto.readthedocs.io/en/latest/porting_guide.html But this guide looks to be obsolete, as there is not anymore whitelist in tests/test.py
Does it mean that boto is now compatible with python3?
Thanks!
Toub
on 11 May 2016
+1
Let me know if there's a way to contribute, this is essential for my use as well.
samsheff
on 25 May 2016
+1
Would love to know what's left in porting mturk to boto3. Thanks.
AlJohri
on 31 May 2016
What's the go to SDK for mturk these days? Ruby? R? The R client seems to be the most up to date and feature complete.
AlJohri
on 1 Jun 2016
+1
sebfest
on 15 Jun 2016
+1
tejaskhot
on 19 Jun 2016
+1
tyler-catlin
on 28 Jun 2016
+1
annacoenen
on 30 Jun 2016
+1
howcouldyouforgetthisusername
on 5 Jul 2016
+1
cdmxx
on 12 Jul 2016
+1
chungeunkim
on 28 Jul 2016
+1
zplizzi
on 9 Aug 2016
+1
anandmalpani
on 2 Sep 2016
+1
romejoe
on 7 Sep 2016
+1
lightstrike
on 13 Sep 2016
+1
rfinz
on 13 Sep 2016
+1
m1yag1
on 2 Nov 2016
+1
ly-nx
on 30 Nov 2016
+1
flypd
on 30 Nov 2016
+1
JVillella
on 8 Dec 2016
I hate to just be another echo here, but... +1!
johansen
on 9 Dec 2016
+1
gabriel-amram
on 12 Dec 2016
+1
binaryaaron
on 9 Jan 2017
+1
tahayk
on 31 Jan 2017
+1
deerzq
on 1 Feb 2017
JordonPhillips
on 28 Feb 2017
Closing, this is now supported. Make sure you upgrade botocore to pull in the mturk client.
jamesls
on 1 Mar 2017
Related issues
amattie
·
4Comments
boompig
·
3Comments
danielmorozoff
·
3Comments
maoo
·
3Comments
darkmeadow
·
3Comments
Most helpful comment
Good news everyone!