This issue will be used to review progress on Version 3.
cc: @natiwa
Hi,
How are you?
I have for you two versions of the header. Please let me know which one is better and I'll continue with that direction. Please take a note that header should fit the height of every screen in that way that orange bottom bar would be visible.
@wbnns I have also a question. I got one comment on Invision regard the section with 3 icons ( Fast p2p transactions, worldwide payment, and low fees processing).
satoshi1iv3s said:
There was discussion on this on GitHub: https://github.com/bitcoin-dot-org/bitcoin.org/pull/2010
It's likely that at present moment it makes sense to emphasize other things, such as decentralization. At current levels of 400 satoshi/byte it's probably not fair to advertise "low processing fees".
Could you tell me more about the final decision? Should I present something different there?
All the best,
Natalie
@natiwa Don't worry about the text/icons, it doesn't really matter yet, and it's easy to change later on anyway. The homepage hasn't changed yet anyway.
I'm not sure if it's just me, but there's something that feels a bit "wrong" with this latest version. I'll try to summarize my thoughts as best as I can:
Perhaps we can take the existing embed of the video on the site (https://i.imgur.com/eDwlJYf.png), and put it on the left, and on restructure the design so the text and buttons are on the right side. And we can go for a more flat (but still orange) design scheme? To me this version just feels like it's for another project, and not for Bitcoin.
@wbnns Curious what your thoughts are too?
@natiwa
Thanks for putting these comps together. Yeah, don't worry about the text for now.
I just went through and left comments on both versions. I agree with all of what @Cobra-Bitcoin already mentioned:
Also:
I agree w/ @Cobra-Bitcoin that this version feels a bit more like a different project, rather than Bitcoin. Don't worry though, you are doing an awesome job on all of these different versions! It's great explore the spectrum of what might be possible to see what might work best so we hit the mark. 馃憤
Looking forward to connecting and discussing everything in our progress meeting later today.
@wbnns @Cobra-Bitcoin New direction.
Link has been updated.
@natiwa
Thanks a bunch - looks good. I like it a lot better than the first two iterations we reviewed yesterday. As discussed in today's progress meeting, let's go ahead and proceed with responsive versions (for handhelds and tablets, like we have with the other designs). Once done, we'll prepare a community vote to settle on the most well-received design, and then press forward extending it across the site's subpages, starting with the most popular ones. I'll start working on an outline for that.
Cc: @Cobra-Bitcoin
@natiwa Looks much better, thanks for so quickly coming up with an alternative. Look forward to seeing the responsive versions!
Hi all,
Please take a look at the Responsive versions:
Desktop
Tablet
Mobile
Navigation
Let me know what you think.
All the best,
N.
@natiwa
Looks great, thanks. I'll compile the various comps so we can proceed with the community vote.
Cc: @Cobra-Bitcoin
Looks really nice. Maybe we can make a post on the blog with all the details about the different versions and how to vote? Then we just share that post everywhere. I think http://www.strawpoll.me/ makes the most sense to use for polling, unless anyone else knows of a better alternative?
@Cobra-Bitcoin
Good idea, I'll put that together.
Draft of the blog post and poll will be ready a bit later this evening (UTC). I'll link the PR to this issue.
Opened #2104 .