Making code style changes for no apparent reason is not a good thing to do, e.g. https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/commit/0d79bc46200f26a97494fe2123a08db42b8d0dd9
It is making backporting features/bug fixes from mainline (Bitcoin Core) hard.
@ftrader told us he wants to apply our Bitcore patches on top of ABC code (see https://www.reddit.com/r/TREZOR/comments/6ompvc/do_trezor_will_support_uahf_in_the_same_you_said/dkmdjgn/) but after these codestyle changes, merging the Bictore patches will be almost impossible task (certainly not doable until August 1st, when you do want to have this ready).
I suggest to revert all formatting patches, such as:

This is not happening.
Pride is a poor substitute for intelligence.
And ad hominems are poor substitutes for arguments.
Many companies and open source projects have a coding standards. Bitcoin has none and it's a complete mess. The good news is that Bitprim already has the set of patches you want, so it's all good.
I am not against code style changes per se, but this will make merging any patches here significantly harder.
Not only bitcore patches, but any safety patches to bitcoin core. And let's face it, bitcoin core is more active than your repo (and will for foreseeable future), so any security changes will be much harder to merge back here, just because of slightly changed coding style.
But it's about priorities I guess :)
Most helpful comment
Pride is a poor substitute for intelligence.