Cut date: 2020-05-04
To report a release-blocking bug, please file a bug using the Release blocker
label, and cc me.
Task list:
Pushed 3.2.0rc1:
RELEASE_NUMBER=3.2.0
BASELINE_COMMIT=1d93d26d9900328dcba0026bf21cb45cc37a4596
git clone https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel.git ~/bazel-release-$RELEASE_NUMBER
cd ~/bazel-release-$RELEASE_NUMBER
scripts/release/release.sh create $RELEASE_NUMBER $BASELINE_COMMIT
scripts/release/release.sh push
Any updates?
I'm not aware of any release blockers or complaints. I think we can release it tomorrow. :)
Bazel 3.2.0 has been pushed! 馃殌
Pinging package maintainers @vbatts @petemounce @excitoon @chenrui333.
Upgraded to latest Bazel in https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/pull/55354
@philwo We were specifically waiting for 3.2.0 for the flag --experimental_windows_watchfs but when we try to use it we get "ERROR: Unrecognized option: --experimental_windows_watchfs". Is it possible that 11334 somehow did not make it to 3.2.0?
3.2.0 was branched at the beginning of the month thus excluding 33106877277e6bfb3944b5b65b5d700fb781764e.
@benjaminp Thank you for the explanation!
@konste Bazel 3.3.0rc1 should be cut beginning of next week, so you can test it using that version then :)
late to the party, but fedora and centos are built https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vbatts/bazel/build/1424821/
Still epel-7-aarch64 failed, but all the rest succeeded.
Thank you @vbatts 馃槉 I'll have a look at the epel7-aarch64 failure. Bazel "should" work on that platform...
+ env ./compile.sh
Building Bazel from scratcherror: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pj9GrC (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pj9GrC (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child return code was: 1
@vbatts It's strange that the compile.sh
command doesn't print any error and just exits with code 1 after printing Building Bazel from scratch
. I currently don't have a CentOS 7 machine on that platform available, but if I have some time, I'll try to find out what's failing there.
@philwo I've filled https://github.com/vbatts/copr-build-bazel/issues/14 for the epel-7-aarch64 build failure.
I welcome any testing that folks offer here :-D
What is the status? Is there any reason why this issue is not closed? Just asking before starting the process to upgrade to 3.2.
@limdor No reason, I think we just forgot to close it. 馃槉
Most helpful comment
I'm not aware of any release blockers or complaints. I think we can release it tomorrow. :)