Badger: Why badger don't need a Bucket ?

Created on 8 Dec 2019 · 2Comments · Source: dgraph-io/badger

I am used boltdb for a long time , I found Bucket is a useful function of it. Now I changed to use Badger.
Why badger don't need a Bucket?

kinquestion

Source

fengyanliang

Most helpful comment

I am used boltdb for a long time , I found Bucket is a useful function of it. Now I changed to use Badger.
Why badger don't need a Bucket?

You can use key prefixes instead of Buckets. It's not as bad as it seems

ForCraft2013 on 8 Dec 2019

👍2

All 2 comments

I am used boltdb for a long time , I found Bucket is a useful function of it. Now I changed to use Badger.
Why badger don't need a Bucket?

You can use key prefixes instead of Buckets. It's not as bad as it seems

ForCraft2013 on 8 Dec 2019

👍2

I am used boltdb for a long time , I found Bucket is a useful function of it. Now I changed to use Badger.
Why badger don't need a Bucket?

You can use key prefixes instead of Buckets. It's not as bad as it seems

Thanks for your replay, ForCraft2013.
But I don't think Prefix scan in badger can be as fast as foreach in a bucket. How can we use it on this condition?

fengyanliang on 9 Dec 2019

Was this page helpful?

0 / 5 - 0 ratings