Please provide a succinct description of the issue.
I think there is great value to add Visual Basic support to Azure Functions.
We should be able to support this via the precompiled approach. We are missing docs/etc. for "full support", but it should just work today.
hmm I might have a weekend project now.
@johnnliu I've reached out to Anthony Green (I know him quite well), and he'll see if there are ways that the VB team can partner with us on this.
You should indeed use the precompiled approach, outlined in https://aka.ms/precompiled-functions.
https://twitter.com/johnnliu/status/849643313942609920
Oh we are going to have a lot of fun.
Imports System.Net
Imports System.Net.Http
Imports System.Threading.Tasks
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Imports System.Web.Script.Serialization
Public Class MyFunction
Public Shared Async Function Run(ByVal req As HttpRequestMessage) As Task(Of HttpResponseMessage)
'parse query parameter
'Dim name = req.GetQueryNameValuePairs()
'.FirstOrDefault(q >= String.Compare(q.Key, "name", True) == 0)
'.Value;
'Get request body
Dim Data As String = Await req.Content.ReadAsStringAsync()
'Set name to query string Or body data
Dim json As Dictionary(Of String, Object) = New JavaScriptSerializer().Deserialize(Of Object)(Data)
Dim name = json.Item("name")
Dim response As HttpResponseMessage = New HttpResponseMessage()
If name Is Nothing Then
response.StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.BadRequest
response.Content = New StringContent("Please pass a name on the query string or in the request body")
Else
response.StatusCode = HttpStatusCode.OK
response.Content = New StringContent("Hello " & name)
End If
Return response
End Function
End Class
Can we tell VBTeam that HttpRequestMessageExtensions don't work and it's really hard to do things like req.GetQueryNameValuePairs() from query string...
Also, VB really should have JSON literals like they have XML literals...

solution structure.
@johnnliu,
I'm not saying that we _should_ have JSON literals. Just that I have an implemented prototype of JSON literals in my fork of Roslyn that I'd love some user feedback on... shhh, don't tell anyone ;)
I'm going to move this issue into the backlog, as the main work to do here is to create samples and documentation. I'll work with @AnthonyDGreen to partner on this.
This is supported with the pre-compiled model. Documentation applies, but we don't currently plan on providing samples and templates.
Most helpful comment
https://twitter.com/johnnliu/status/849643313942609920
Oh we are going to have a lot of fun.