Azure-docs: v2.0 and v2.1 version conflict / incompatability?

Created on 8 Nov 2019  Â·  4Comments  Â·  Source: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs

So I've run into a problem where my batch transcription does not fire my webhook. I noticed that the batch transcription sample is using version 2.0 while this webhook documentation is referencing v2.1. When I try to create webhooks by changing the version number to 2.0, the same, working request fails. When I try to find the swagger for version 2.1 I get page not found.

https://westus.cris.ai/docs/v2.0/swagger

https://westus.cris.ai/docs/v2.1/swagger

This url is referenced by this page (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/speech-service/batch-transcription) but the swagger UI is only for version 2.0 not 2.1
https://westus.cris.ai/swagger/ui/index


Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

Pri2 cognitive-servicesvc cxp product-question speech-servicsubsvc triaged

Most helpful comment

v2.0 does not support webhooks.
v2.1 is not released and there will be breaking changes until we release the new API version.
However, if you want to look into the documentation for v2.1 (and others) please try here develop.cris.ai/swagger

All 4 comments

@markti
Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly.

@PanosPeriorellis Hi Panos, could you please help us to check for this issue? Thanks a lot.

v2.0 does not support webhooks.
v2.1 is not released and there will be breaking changes until we release the new API version.
However, if you want to look into the documentation for v2.1 (and others) please try here develop.cris.ai/swagger

@markti
We will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please respond here and @YutongTie-MSFT and we will gladly continue the discussion.

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

spottedmahn picture spottedmahn  Â·  3Comments

jebeld17 picture jebeld17  Â·  3Comments

paulmarshall picture paulmarshall  Â·  3Comments

monteledwards picture monteledwards  Â·  3Comments

behnam89 picture behnam89  Â·  3Comments