Azure-docs: Support scenario had better "source->target" than "target->source".

[yuharucan]

Support scenario had better "source->target" than "target->source".

---

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

• ID: 8c8dc618-bff7-b1aa-be2c-b6b933f75545
• Version Independent ID: 9a608dd8-d781-eb4a-c796-34f758f0d58a
• Content: Database migration scenario status
• Content Source: articles/dms/resource-scenario-status.md
• Service: dms
• GitHub Login: @HJToland3
• Microsoft Alias: jtoland

[jakaruna-MSFT]

Thanks for the feedback! We are currently investigating and will update you shortly.

[HJToland3]

@yuharucan, for purposes of this table, we've intentionally listed targets and then various sources from which the user might be migrating. Which support scenario are you referencing? Thanks!

[Mike-Ubezzi-MSFT]

Given the scenario in which the information is being presented; reverse engineering the process to first identify the desired database platform the migration is to Target, a list of supported Source database platforms can be presented. The Target -> Source analogy works in this case.

We will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please comment and we will gladly continue the discussion. Thanks!

[yuharucan]

Users start "source" which they have existing databaes and they want to understand that which target can they migrate from their databases to.

[HJToland3]

@yuharucan, this table is intended to show the status of each migration scenario, not which targets are available for each source. You can get a better idea of which targets are available for which resources on this page: https://docs.microsoft.com/azure/dms/dms-tools-matrix. You can also check out the Azure Database Migration Guide at https://datamigration.microsoft.com/.