Azure-docs: Links at top all point to azure-documentdb not azure-cosmosdb

[WilliamBerryiii]

The links at the top of this file appear to be out of date. Should they not be referencing azure-cosmosdb

Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

• ID: b2550c40-5054-209e-1378-eeb3b10d6e34
• Version Independent ID: d935f42c-4b25-7ca2-b7a4-acde45a16b80
• Content: Azure Cosmos DB: SQL Java API, SDK & resources
• Content Source: articles/cosmos-db/sql-api-sdk-java.md
• Service: cosmos-db
• GitHub Login: @SnehaGunda
• Microsoft Alias: sngun

[Mike-Ubezzi-MSFT]

@WilliamBerryiii Thank you for providing this detail. Many of the projects were started when the product was known as Azure DocumentDB and since the name change to Azure Cosmos DB, the namespace for many of the projects remains as DocumentDB.

[Mike-Ubezzi-MSFT]

I am making the content owner aware of this request as perhaps there is some work being done to address this.

[SnehaGunda]

@WilliamBerryiii though the product name is changed to Azure Cosmos DB the underlying resource provider is still named DocumentDB, and the source code also uses DocumentDB. There isn't anything we can do about it with docs. Our product group is already aware of this and we have plans to fix.

We will close the issue if you don't have further questions.

please-close

[Mike-Ubezzi-MSFT]

We will now proceed to close this thread. If there are further questions regarding this matter, please comment and we will gladly continue the discussion.

[WilliamBerryiii]

@Mike-Ubezzi-MSFT & @SnehaGunda - I believe the latest libraries are published as azure-cosmosdb ... see link here: https://search.maven.org/artifact/com.microsoft.azure/azure-cosmosdb/2.4.4/jar ... would it be helpful to have a PR with the updated links? Or am I wrong?

[Mike-Ubezzi-MSFT]

@WilliamBerryiii Thanks for the additional detail. As those changes are made upstream from docs (as reflected in the Maven repo item for azure-cosmosdb), the docs will reflect these changes as @SnehaGunda has pointed out. Providing this detail here though is very helpful.