Azure-docs: Inconsistent utterances in batch testing tutorial?

Created on 12 Feb 2019  Â·  4Comments  Â·  Source: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs

I saw in this closed issue that the tutorial would get a revamp by January 7 but that hasn't happened. Even if the revamp is still coming I'd like to report these issues in case some portions of the tutorial remain. As the closed issue states, inconsistencies start to appear in the GetJobInformation test results section.

The utterances corresponding the top point in the False positive section are Can I apply for any database jobs with this resume? and Can I apply for any database jobs with this resume?.

Presumably this is meant to say:

The utterances corresponding the top point in the False positive section are Is there a database position open in Los Colinas? and Can I apply for any database jobs with this resume?.

But not only is the same utterance repeated, that utterance doesn't even appear in the sample batch test provided earlier:

[
    {
      "text": "Are there any janitorial jobs currently open?",
      "intent": "GetJobInformation",
      "entities": []
    },
    {
      "text": "I would like a fullstack typescript programming with azure job",
      "intent": "GetJobInformation",
      "entities": []
    },
    {
      "text": "Is there a database position open in Los Colinas?",
      "intent": "GetJobInformation",
      "entities": []
    },
    {
      "text": "Please find database jobs open today in Seattle",
      "intent": "GetJobInformation",
      "entities": []
    }
  ]

So there seem to be two sets of utterances at play and I don't know which is correct. The missing utterance is important of course because the tutorial goes on to try to correct the false negative by adding the words "apply" and "resume" to the GetJobInformation intent but none of the utterances in the sample have those words anyway.


Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

Pri2 assigned-to-author cognitive-servicesvc doc-bug in-progress language-understandinsubsvc triaged

Most helpful comment

@v-kydela Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to investigate further and update the document as appropriate.

@diberry Hi Dina, this is a existing issue, could you please check it again and update the document accordingly? Thanks a lot!

All 4 comments

@v-kydela Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to investigate further and update the document as appropriate.

@diberry Hi Dina, this is a existing issue, could you please check it again and update the document accordingly? Thanks a lot!

Please add the label language-understanding/subsvc to this issue.
Thank you.

in-progress

This doc has been validated and will be published today. #please-close

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

ianpowell2017 picture ianpowell2017  Â·  3Comments

jamesgallagher-ie picture jamesgallagher-ie  Â·  3Comments

JeffLoo-ong picture JeffLoo-ong  Â·  3Comments

mrdfuse picture mrdfuse  Â·  3Comments

spottedmahn picture spottedmahn  Â·  3Comments