Azure-docs: Is WebSocket an officially supported protocol?

Created on 30 Jun 2018  Â·  4Comments  Â·  Source: MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs

There are shortcomings from REST (not able to transcribe a long text). And it seems SDK is using WebSocket protocol instead. The WebSocket protocol spec can be found at https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/speech/API-reference-rest/websocketprotocol.

Is WebSocket an officially supported protocol? If yes, can it be add to this list?


Document Details

⚠ Do not edit this section. It is required for docs.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

assigned-to-author cognitive-servicesvc doc-enhancement triaged

Most helpful comment

Yes ,the current Speech SDK is using WebSocket for communication with service. One of advantages of the Speech SDK is to make users easy to use the Speech service without knowing details of the low-level protocol. That is why we have not put the procol spec in the documentation site. The protocol you mentioned is the one that the current SDK is using, but it might be updated/extended in future to support new features and functionalities.

Thanks,

All 4 comments

@compulim Thanks for the feedback! I have assigned the issue to the content author to investigate and update as appropriate.

I've let the developers know to drop by this question.

Yes ,the current Speech SDK is using WebSocket for communication with service. One of advantages of the Speech SDK is to make users easy to use the Speech service without knowing details of the low-level protocol. That is why we have not put the procol spec in the documentation site. The protocol you mentioned is the one that the current SDK is using, but it might be updated/extended in future to support new features and functionalities.

Thanks,

please-close

Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

AronT-TLV picture AronT-TLV  Â·  3Comments

jharbieh picture jharbieh  Â·  3Comments

JeffLoo-ong picture JeffLoo-ong  Â·  3Comments

DeepPuddles picture DeepPuddles  Â·  3Comments

behnam89 picture behnam89  Â·  3Comments