Azure-cosmos-dotnet-v2: When can we expect source code of the .NET SDK?

Created on 8 Jun 2016 · 10Comments · Source: Azure/azure-cosmos-dotnet-v2

The Readme file with a promise to open source the .NET SDK was published more than a year ago, and the source code is still not available.

Do you guys still plan to publish it?

Source

olegburov

👍10 ❤1

Most helpful comment

It turns this involves quite a bit of non-trivial work.

@aliuy I'm curious about that.

sandorfr on 14 Jun 2016

👍7

All 10 comments

Yes - but we don't have any timelines yet. It turns this involves quite a bit of non-trivial work.

aliuy on 14 Jun 2016

😕5

It turns this involves quite a bit of non-trivial work.

@aliuy I'm curious about that.

sandorfr on 14 Jun 2016

👍7

since incorporating DocumentDB and this SDK in to our codebase, we've hit a wall resulting from Issue #118 (we can't include a class library that has the SDK as a dependency as a dependency of our API app). One way I could have gotten around this was by having the source code to step through, and or, creating my own build. We're still without solution.

I'm not sure what's non-trivial about this (@aliuy) , but it seems imperative and probably a huge benefit to the DocumentDB product offering that the library source be opened. Would very much appreciate it.

aarondcoleman on 16 Nov 2016

😕1

DocumentDB itself is already kind of a blackbox but when you add the SDK on top of it, troubleshooting becomes a nightmare. This is no mere issue you need to figure out something.

bpatra on 15 Mar 2017

Feature request asked on uservoice, consider upvoting
https://feedback.azure.com/forums/263030-documentdb/suggestions/18902368-opensource-documentdb-net-sdk

bpatra on 11 Apr 2017

👍5

Hi DocumentDB team. Any update on the time lines for this?

davetheunissen on 15 Feb 2018

Well looks like java is more trivial than c#, since the cosmosdb java sdk source code was open sourced. Dam the c# code is either a mess or is just easy to program in java.