Automapper: Get rid of static API (again)?

Created on 2 May 2019  路  2Comments  路  Source: AutoMapper/AutoMapper

With so many folks using the MS DI extension, is there any value in keeping around the static version at this point? It just seems to cause more problems.

Improvement
Source
picture jbogard
😕1

Most helpful comment

I'd say let's start with obsolete :)

picture lbargaoanu on 2 May 2019
👍6

All 2 comments

I'd say let's start with obsolete :)

lbargaoanu picture lbargaoanu on 2 May 2019
👍6

This thread has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.

lock[bot] picture lock[bot] on 24 Jun 2019
Was this page helpful?
0 / 5 - 0 ratings

Related issues

jbogard picture jbogard  路  7Comments
AndyAyersMS picture AndyAyersMS  路  5Comments
jepl4052 picture jepl4052  路  6Comments
arielcloud picture arielcloud  路  4Comments
JobaDiniz picture JobaDiniz  路  5Comments